Subject:
|
Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.suggestions
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jun 2002 21:16:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1185 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.suggestions, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.admin.suggestions, William R. Ward writes:
> > "Jude Beaudin" <shiningblade@rogers.com> writes:
> >
> > > I have noticed for quite a while that we (LUGNET users) have become laxed
> > > about what is being posted to .lego.*
> > >
> > > Based on the ng clarification posted by Todd:
> > >
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=6
> > >
> > > We are all (myself included) guilty of posting unnecessarily to these
> > > groups. As a result there is a high noise ratio to wade through. Perhaps it
> > > is time for us (as a community) to start reducing the amount of posts to the
> > > groups. Either that or redefine the clarification.
> >
> > This is probably due to the confusion between the .dear-lego and
> > .lego.* rules. I would like to make a more concrete suggestion: get
> > rid of .dear-lego, and create some .lego.* groups that are
> > specifically for discussions among lugnetters about TLC and its
> > policies, etc. For example: .lego.wishlist can replace .dear-lego,
> > .lego.discuss can be added, etc.
>
> Until the *default* web view (not just "an available view", I know it's
> available) is without subgroups folded in, I'd rather see .dear-lego kept
> off to the side and less traffic that belongs in .dear-lego misposted to
> .lego.direct
>
> Otherwise the default view of .lego is still noisy
>
> That's my view anyway
Are you suggesting we put aliases on these pages:
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/direct/
http://news.lugnet.com/lego/
to .dear-lego? Because that's a pretty good idea.
Do you think the .lego charters could use a brief "normal version" along with
the more detailed message about posting there? or would then no one read the
longer message?
-Suz
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
| (...) No, but merely because I hadn't thought of it. I was just suggesting not moving .dear-lego (renamed or not) under .lego so that its content would not get mixed in when one viewed .lego from the web using the default interface. This is (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Enforce .lego.* rules
|
| (...) Until the *default* web view (not just "an available view", I know it's available) is without subgroups folded in, I'd rather see .dear-lego kept off to the side and less traffic that belongs in .dear-lego misposted to .lego.direct Otherwise (...) (22 years ago, 20-Jun-02, to lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
6 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
