To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: pieniazek
 Results 3881 – 3900 of about 16000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: ...I almost peed! (Or: VIDEO of the most amazing thing ever)
 
(...) Connect Four(tm) has two sides... Would you allow each robot to play from its own side so the back away has to be just a few inches to clear the piece dropping entry point, or would you require both robots to play from the same side (making (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Wow
 
(...) What I liked about it was that there's a bit of a story to it! A nice heroic story to boot. That gold ladder, though, on the lander... is that from a set or painted. (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.space)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: The usual shot of Chris with a Train...
 
(...) I wasn't aware that using Photoshop was life threatening, I'll have to keep that in mind! (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Gulf of understanding is mutual
 
A good article from an expat Brit (now a US citizen) (URL) favorite quote: 'In off-topic.debate a year and a half ago, I was talking to one of my Canadian friends about the United States Constitution. He waved away the Constitution with a laugh. (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: The future of GLUG
 
Grabbing www.gamelug.org (or SOME url that people like) is a good idea even if no website is put behind it. It doesn't cost much to grab it for a couple years and I'll cover the cost if no one else will. (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.org.glug)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
 
(...) Ya, you're right. What the US is doing to the terrorism detainees, as you describe above, is shocking and disgusting. Thanks for reminding us. Oh wait, you're talking about the ICC, aren't you? I got confused for a minute (...) It does? Not if (...) (22 years ago, 19-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: New MOCs -- A whole city, inspired by Greenwich Village
 
(...) <snip> Someone clued me in to this (the gallery on BS) before your announcment and I've been spending a good part of the afternoon drooling. Wow. There are just so many nifty details, I am hard pressed to pick a fave, but i am very partial to (...) (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.town)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Narrow Gauge Steam Critter in Dark Blue
 
(...) Didn't say it would be EASY. Said .... "if you want to impress me, motorize it!" If it was easy I would have done it by now myself. (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Narrow Gauge Steam Critter in Dark Blue
 
(...) ALL critters are cute. Some are cuter than others... this is one of the cutest! Nice work. But if you want to impress me, motorize it! (22 years ago, 18-Mar-03, to lugnet.trains)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Gencon At Indy
 
The current slate a games at Gencon include several two-hour BrikWars demos, two six-hour BrikWars games, two Evil Stevies Pirate Game, two Pirate Wars games, a Mechaton game, maybe a robotics display, a combat comparision game. A long list am I (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jul-03, to lugnet.org.glug, lugnet.gaming.brikwars)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
 
(...) I hear you. We may find that we need to move to phone to get more done faster but can start that way (...) Yep, me too. (...) If putting the function into ldraw.org itself isn't fast/easy, yes. Yahoo Groups, although disliked by some, are (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Bricks? Magazine Announcements: Charter Subscription Offer and Preview Sneak Peek
 
(...) I can see how some might think that. And different people's budgets are different, of course. Mine is a lot tighter than it used to be but 12 bucks doesn't seem like a lot of money to me, so I took a flyer on a charter subscription already. (I (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.publish)  
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
 
(...) Distant Early Warning. The network of radar bases in Alaska and Canada's far north intended to give the earliest possible terrestrial warning of incoming transpolar missile attack targeted at either the US or Canada. Not the most critical (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
 
GREAT input Wayne. (now, can we twist Wayne's arm to be on the SC?) Yes, we should learn from orgs but not adopt everything. The proper balance is key. What follows is some ILTCO organizing committee experience. On the topic of conference calls, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Why us? and if us, why this way?
 
(...) Nor do I. Canada has been a staunch friend of the US far more often than not. (...) Here I think you may want to check your recollection better. Who mans the DEW? (...) I'd not be so dismissive so quickly. His arguments are sound, they're just (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Why us? and if us, why this way?
 
(...) (URL) always agree with Hanson but he's right this time. Even if you think there's a moral obligation (that the US somehow has gotten stuck with ) to right every wrong (which I do not! I go ONLY as far as saying we ought to clean up the messes (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: LDraw Versioning (Was Re: Backwards Compatibility)
 
This thread has grown so much since Friday it's hard to know exactly where to interject.... so I just picked a spot. I'll have more to say later after reading the thread again but wanted to throw a few comments out. (...) YES! Exactly. And one could (...) (22 years ago, 17-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.278)

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Namespace Pollution is a technical term. It's not meant as an insult, mind you. It refers to a common phenomena in programming, in which things become hard to use because of scope problems, because things named in global scope interfere with (...) (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) Neither. You should PUBLICLY support the command and make it known that you are doing so. (...) maybe. (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

  Re: Calling all Meta-commands
 
(...) One thing that I think would help reduce namespace pollution is if everyone did what LTrax did... prefix the command with the app name for uniqueness. Not a perfect solution, of course. (22 years ago, 14-Mar-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 

pieniazek
(score: 0.277)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR