|
 | | Re: Lego Modular tables
|
| (...) Something that came up on the call is that for geometry reasons, if you want curved modules not to have overhanging track you need your track centers on multiples of 8 studs away from the module edge. So the outermost track should be at 8 (...) (25 years ago, 24-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|  
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| | Re: Proposed 'Legomodule' standard
|
| (...) This is fine. Have you considered...lowering the scenery and keeping the track at the same level? However, I would tend to think that it would work either way...and 10 bricks high is buildable by more people than 20 (about 2/3 bricks as a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| | Re: New LEGO train realism?
|
| john kelly <jkelly69@skypoint.com> wrote in message news:Frvws2.LtC@lugnet.com... (...) doubt (...) to (...) trailer. Well, you could always secure your rack with either a spacer or lock the wheels. I would suggest that straps could hold it to a (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| | Proposed 'Legomodule' standard
|
| Larry P and I have been overloading my email server going back and forth on this topic today. This is what I'm proposing: TWO standards. A 'LOW' standard, and a 'HIGH' standard. Low standard is 10 bricks tall, High standard is 20 bricks tall. We'd (...) (25 years ago, 23-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| | Re: GMLUG Users
|
| Except the gmltc.org server is still sitting in my basement eagerly awaiting my new dsl connection so more people can connect to it. If you wanted to bring your computer over, I could wire you in though.... <grin> -john (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.loc.us.mn, lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.145)
|
|
| | Re: New 9V Digital Trains for Germany this Autumn
|
| In lugnet.trains, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) AND, we'll spend a *LOT* of money on new LEGO Train sets... If these sets are real, I'm thinking I need multiple copies of each of them - and I'm sure the rest of the GMLTC thinks the same way! (...) (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| | Re: Biggest LEGO Maniacs
|
| (...) Conan is the co-owner (along with his uncle, Chuck) of the approximately 2.3 million brick collection of the GMLTC. He isn't on the 'Net - no time, he says. And he is quite real; I am one of the people who invades his basement every week to (...) (25 years ago, 1-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| | Re: 3 x 6 train nosepiece
|
| (...) No such thing as a "dumb question"!! Are you talking about the piece in the small vehicle in #6473 "Res-Q Cruiser"? JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| | Re: Legomodular standards?
|
| (...) Except the 'pattern' is supposed to be fairly random - everyone does it differently. We decided to add the black just to break up the huge expanse of red that we'd otherwise have. So far, no one at any show has noticed the difference between (...) (25 years ago, 29-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| | Re: 6 vs. 8 wide?
|
| (...) But what a nice dilemma to have! (I'd vote for 8-wide trains...) John Neal is too busy building *14* wide "G" scale cars... ;-) JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 31-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.144)
|
|
| |
|
gmltc
(score: 1.143)
|
