To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 5193
5192  |  5194
Subject: 
Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org
Date: 
Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:35:18 GMT
Viewed: 
2410 times
  
In lugnet.trains, Stephen F. Roberts writes:
...We are using table top layouts based loosely on the PNLTC standard. An
observation I have is using incremental brick heights between the two
different table heights. PNLTC (and WAMALUG) use 36 5/8" as 'ground level'
while the proposed standard uses 29 3/4" + 10 bricks as ground level (33
11/16"). That's nearly 8 bricks difference (1 brick ~1 cm), and
unfortunately, this does not come out to a clean number of bricks so it would
be exceedingly difficult to marry the two together in a pure fashion.

There are two 'standard' heights:
29 3/4" table + baseplate + 10 bricks + 1 plate
29 3/4" table + baseplate + 22 bricks + 1 plate
(extra plate is used to represent 'ballast' under the tracks)

The higher one should be close to PNLTC / WAMALUG table height, or at least
closer than the lower one.

The proposed GMLTC layout will have both heights, so if someday we do a show
with another club we should be able to work our layouts together...

JohnG, GMLTC



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
 
And the BayLTC layout will be using the upper height exclusively, as our layout will include the optional low track at 4 bricks+1 plate. JIG: Where the heck did you guys get THAT MANY small black and gray plates? I can't imagine how I am going to (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
  Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
 
(...) ...Yea, its closer, but overshoots some :-/ (sunken rail beds? :-) ...Its only a nuisance because its close to 2" for either version, and as we all know, LEGO trains do _not_ like going up or down slopes much :-/ (...) ...That's about all I'm (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)
  Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
 
(...) ...Well, since most of the terrain is red bricks, it could also be shielding from the rolling rivers of lava... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wamalug guy ((URL) #160 (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: First draft of the Lego-Modular Train layout standards posted..
 
(...) discussion thru threads before now :-/. But I can say I support the idea and am figuring out now how to make our layout compatible with the modular one. ...We are using table top layouts based loosely on the PNLTC standard. An observation I (...) (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org)

24 Messages in This Thread:






Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR