Results 6261 – 6280 of 12411.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: Why [no single language] is good for Mindstorms
|
| (...) The RIS v2.0 software actually DID save files in "Mindscript", which is a text language. I suspect they won't go that direction again, because it just wasn't that popular. (...) ... (...) Sorry if I wasn't clear. TLG must provide FIRMWARE (...) (19 years ago, 25-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|  
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Another New NXT Utility
|
| (...) Hi John, Thanks for adding the PNG support. I downloaded and played with both versions of the util and the PNG save works great. Once again, many thanks for the utility and I look forward to the clear NXT screen captures that will help us all (...) (18 years ago, 12-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Powering 9v Trains using the NXT
|
| (...) I'm not sure if there's a better way, and I haven't tried it with an NXT, but I've had good luck with option 2 using an RCX. I isolated the track by putting a bit of clear tape over the ends that connect to the other track sections. -Elroy (17 years ago, 17-Oct-07, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.org.us.ulug)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: I feel Blue but aesthetics is gray.
|
| (...) I meant that with Technic; there will always be holes and gaps in the bodies of cars or the frames of machinery. For a "model builder" that is serious about exact aesthetic details, Model team is more ideal. Dennis Bossman does not like (...) (18 years ago, 22-Jul-06, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Newsgroup structure: some tough decisions
|
| (...) There will always be gray areas and blurred lines. The only real way to avoid them is to jump to one extreme or the other- ie: either one group (.market.anything-goes) or a multiplicity of groups (.auction.ebay, .auction.private, (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.admin.nntp)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Brick by Brick Auction Update--G2
|
| Please Note: Sometime after 8:00 PM my site went offline. Until I can fix it, auction updates will be via e-mail. New bidders e-mail me at: brickbybrick@aol.com for auction rules and bidding info. I will e-mail winning bidders their total plus (...) (25 years ago, 1-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: 1 by bricks without center studs
|
| (...) As Tom Garrison mentioned in the other post, they were produced in all the Trans+ colors. However, the 1x4 without posts underneath were not produced in any solid colors. The 1x2, 1x6 and 1x8 bricks were made as far back as the mid 50's (but (...) (20 years ago, 16-Aug-04, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: A BrikWars question
|
| (...) It's true; we were trying to keep the range lower than Pistols, which had to be lower than Rifles, which had to be lower than Siege Weapons, which had to be lower than two feet or nobody would be able to clear enough space for a proper (...) (25 years ago, 11-Apr-00, to lugnet.gaming)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: New Gear Boxes and Motor Systems
|
| "Eric Sophie" <mylegomaster@aol.com> wrote in message news:HFqJwE.105I@lugnet.com... (...) ??? I'm not sure what the excitement is about. I was given this set recently (otherwise I would not have gone near it), and I'm not terribly impressed with (...) (21 years ago, 31-May-03, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Please fix the pictures on the bulk order page!
|
| Maybe you are not following the threads here. Apparently, several of the images on the bulk order page are not the right pictures. 1. Item "G #3444" on page one looks like 45° roof ridges but everyone is reporting that the roof ridges are the 30° (...) (24 years ago, 20-Jun-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Brick by Brick Auction Final Results
|
| Hi, This is a Brick by Brick Auction Update: 10/11 - 2:30 P.M. The Brick by Brick Auction is now completed. I've sent e-mail to all winners between Oct. 4th and 8th, it's possible some e-mail did not go through. Please let me know, if you haven't (...) (25 years ago, 11-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Numbers...
|
| Here's the current numbers from the Parts Tracker..... From the "Parts List" page: Parts (443 files) Subparts (114 files) Primitives (42 files) 48-Segment Primitives (20 files) (Total: 619) From the "Certification List" page: 20 certified files. 48 (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Help with Serial Ports, Please !!!
|
| Hello, I'm trying to port some working Qbasic code to Tcl8.08 (NT4.0), so I can embed it into the tcl-httpd, and make a robotic application controllable from the web (with the Tcl plug-in), but I'm having a hard time configuring the serial port (...) (26 years ago, 20-Mar-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | RCX message's
|
| Hi everybody, I'm new to this newsgroup, and I've found much interesting information on this group. I'm writing a hypercard XFCN to control the Cybermaster and it is working right now, but I have problems with the following messaging commands : 90 (...) (26 years ago, 23-Jan-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Sharp GP2D02 and assembly language
|
| Hi, I have the same problem. For now I don't care since the GP2D02 is the only thing connected to an digital output. I am using the following: Include: subroutine_get_userval: ldab USERVAL ; load USERVAL to d register clra ; clear upper byte rts ; (...) (26 years ago, 23-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: LEGO Mentioned in Business Week
|
| (...) Yes, but is it: January 2, 2003 January 3, 2002 February 1, 2003 February 3, 2001 March 1, 2002 March 2, 2001 (ignoring the six dates from a century earlier) Not that I was asking for a clear answer. It was just my example of an ultimately (...) (26 years ago, 24-Feb-99, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
|
| | Re: Rcx And Solar Power
|
| (...) plug (...) RCX (...) -Lego will also get kind of snippy if you use a non-approved power source, burn out the RCX, and try to get them to replace it. They're good folk, but RCXes are expensive, and the warranty is fairly clear. -JW Jonathan (...) (25 years ago, 9-Jul-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.167)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
