|
 | | Re: rtlToronto14 AC rule change?
|
| (...) The rule seems pretty clear. "...and any entanglement means immediate forfeit to the other player." if it doesn't get entanglemented, it's fine. :) Maybe I will build a robot for this event. It'll be called "The Entangler". It has a 36 inch (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|  
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: general session starting.
|
| (...) To be 100% clear, the comic that Greg and I created was positive, humourous, and informative. We didn't make fun of the AFOLs at all. I'd be happy to email you a copy for your review if you like. Jake --- Jake McKee Community Liaison LEGO (...) (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.events.brickfest)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) I'm not clear on what the distinction is; was he not suggesting a change in the way BL operates rather than bring his listing within the ToS? Does that not imply that he wanted the ToS changed? Or do you mean he wanted the wording to remain (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Can we help?
|
| (...) To be completely clear... we have NOT announced we are moving production to China. Rather we have simply been mentioning that, as good business practice, we are looking at options. As was mentioned elsewhere, 80% of the toy business has it's (...) (20 years ago, 25-Oct-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
| (...) I think that I didn't make myself clear. All I am asking for is that the new run of 10152s be numbered "10153" or something. This simple change preserves the collectiblity of the 10052s. I wasn't suggesting any more radical change than that. (...) (20 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Lego controller
|
| Martijn, Most of these are pretty clear. Of course, this discussion comes up every few months. But I have a couple questions... On Tue, May 31, 2005 5:44 am, Martijn Boogaarts said: (...) Do many people use the IR as a way to communicate between a (...) (19 years ago, 31-May-05, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Swan firmware crash!
|
| (...) * Maybe I wasn't too clear, but really there isn't much to say: it is the SetMotorPower128 command that causes the error. * Another question is: why costants MTR_A or MTR_B don't work at all? Here's the code(all the code): task main{ (...) (19 years ago, 20-Jul-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: AFX Lego Racing
|
| (...) AAaaargh!! Let me be VERY clear on this - I *DID* like the car modification. Those were nice. It's just my typing/thinking that suck eggs. Seriously, that was a brain-fart, the cars look nice. (...) Not pointless - just less active ;-). -- (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-06, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: 6-wide Canadian Pacific GE ES44AC
|
| (...) onlinelabels.com has clear labels. I used them for this effort: (URL) ___...___ It's here! Your new message! Get new email alerts with the free Yahoo! Toolbar. (URL) (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.trains)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Colinear Vertices
|
| (...) I looked at LDDP sources (very clear BTW!). Threshold is compared against square of cross product of each angle of quad. So it depends of size of quad to 4th power! Not very good imho, but since it works for such a long time I used the same (...) (16 years ago, 11-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Learning LSynth
|
| (...) Thank you for your clear and simple solutions. Since it is relatively simple to get this to work I suppose it will be one of the new features of the upcoming release (hint, hint...) Jetro (16 years ago, 27-Feb-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Assembled parts, ~ and categories
|
| (...) Thanks for make that clear now. I have just also link this post in the wiki ((URL) so we can find it much quicker in the future. I have also put there a lot of other stuff that I feel we should keep for future use. cu mikeheide (15 years ago, 14-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: LPub 4.0.0.4 CLEAR / BUFEXCHG issue
|
| (...) Pleasure. (I write software for a living and keep threatening to change the "on-hold music" to "If *you* can't replicate it, *I* can't fix it!") LPub 4 with LDView 4.1 has made making instructions fun again - from MLCad design/build suitable (...) (15 years ago, 8-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: LPub 4.0.0.4 CLEAR / BUFEXCHG issue
|
| (...) Amen to that! (...) Yeah, LPub 4 is a bit different that LPub 2. It can be a lot more fun. Did you try resizing PLIs or BOMs? You can do it with the mouse. Kevin (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: LPub 4.0.0.4 CLEAR / BUFEXCHG issue
|
| (...) Not yet, although I've seen you can do it. Trying to get the basic instructions and BOM made, then I'll look at all the wizzy extras (like cover pages) LPub 4 is very productive - (URL) - not bad seeing as I only started the layouts last Wed (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
|
| | Re: Problems with LDView
|
| (...) Hi! Problem solved! Needed to clear the image cache a couple of times. Thank you very much! Best regards, Miran (13 years ago, 30-Jul-11, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
clear
(score: 1.168)
|
