Subject:
|
Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Aug 2004 08:42:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1735 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Ross Crawford wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur wrote:
| |
No. He showed that he thought he could dictate the ToS.
|
Is there even the slightest shred of evidence for this statement?
|
Yes, his own words:
“Dan informed me yesterday that I needed to remove that wording as it’s a
ToS violation. I responded with a suggestion for a different approach.”
Later: “...I responded rather tersely, suggesting that the implementation
be fixed instead. In hindsight I should have either immediately removed the
text or composed an explanation, but I was tired...”
i.e. rather than bring his listings within the ToS, he suggested the ToS be
altered. You(?) or I would have done as Dan had requested, then sought to
contest the matter if it was significant enough.
|
To be fair, his response was “How about you implement bulk correctly instead?
Seems a better solution to me.” (according to Dan). That doesn’t suggest that
ToS be altered, rather that (as Lar saw it) a feature be (re-)implemented
correctly.
|
I’m not clear on what the distinction is; was he not suggesting a change in the
way BL operates rather than bring his listing within the ToS? Does that not
imply that he wanted the ToS changed?
Or do you mean he wanted the wording to remain unchanged, but its application
modified to suit his wants. If that is the case, you are splitting hairs!
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) Does "suggesting a change" really seem to you to be the same as "dictating?" Seriously? Maybe you think it's just a matter of spin, but your first (unfounded) claim is simply incorrect (based on all the evidence I have) and your most recent (...) (20 years ago, 26-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: suspended Bricklink shops/
|
| (...) To be fair, his response was "How about you implement bulk correctly instead? Seems a better solution to me." (according to Dan). That doesn't suggest that ToS be altered, rather that (as Lar saw it) a feature be (re-)implemented correctly. (...) (20 years ago, 25-Aug-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
131 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
