|
 | | Zach's third LEGO auction (update 25)
|
| If you have finished bidding, as most of you have, you are free to contact me to arrange for payment and shipping. Many of you have already done so. The rest of you can choose to do the same, or wait for me to contact you at the end of the auction. (...) (25 years ago, 7-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|  
all, rights
(score: 2.552)
|
|
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| Thank you for your response -- we appreciate it. (...) I can agree with and respect your other points, especially regarding the retailer's catalog. That makes sense. However, this one doesn't. There is no legal precedent for this, but this sort of (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.552)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| | Re: Taxes from Lego auctions?
|
| Whoa, whoa... (...) This, above, has almost NOTHING to do with interest. It so happens that I agree with some (most? almost all?) of your points(1). I'd prefer that my money be issued by a private bank, and backed by something tangible, instead of (...) (25 years ago, 25-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| | Zach's third LEGO auction (final update)
|
| This the final standing. Thanks to everyone who participated. Welcome to my third RTL auction. It has been about 18 months since my last auction, time for another one to clear some of my closet space and consolidate my core LEGO collection. Most of (...) (25 years ago, 10-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| | Re: Enough already
|
| I have to say, I agree with Todd (and Susan, I presume). It seems to me that there are an awful lot of folks who are doing an awful lot of bellyacheing, and this over VERY minor things. The wealth of online matereial which is, in fact, copyrighted (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| | Re: Enough already
|
| (...) A clearer distinction can be drawn by saying "you are acting like a such and such" as opposed to saying "you *are* a such and such." Similar to the difference between "you are lying" and "you are a liar." By criticizing someone's action or (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.admin.general)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.551)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.550)
|
|
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| * Jacob Sparre Andersen (sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk) [991119 10:29]: (...) Even worse; Giving a part to the part-library gives up certain rights to the part. If it isn't clear what rights exist, then people may not make parts for the part-library. I (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.550)
|
|
| | Re: Art and Property ZRights
|
| (...) Some art is intended to create an intellectual response, not emotional, or as an aid to meditation (Mark Rothko's "glowing squares"), or.... (...) Each will assign their own unique value. (...) When Libertarians are the majority party, I'll (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.550)
|
|
| | Re: Blue Hopper Car Mania...
|
| (...) What else would I do on sunday nights? ;) (...) The longer I think about it (and speak to some slightly more hardcore libertarians over on other places), the harder it gets for me to distinguish (hardcore) libertarianism from anarchism. The (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.549)
|
|
| | Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
| (...) Ah.. this explains all. G Dubya Bush. (...) "and I was wrong AND HERE'S WHAT I AM GOING TO DO ABOUT IT:"[emphasis mine]? Neither did Frank answer that one, BTW. Although I inferred that to Frank, "here's what I am going to do about it" would (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.549)
|
|
| | Re: OO programing in RCX
|
| Hi Eric, Yes, I believe you could create a sensor object on the VB side and write your code thinking in terms of a sensor object. Here's one way: =-=-=-= BEGIN SAMPLE CODE =-=-=-= Private m_SensorNumber As Integer Private m_SensorType As Integer (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.549)
|
|
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| (...) The files James published are copyrighted, and his family has control on the copyright. They have given 'us', the L-CAD group, permission to continue to publish and maintain his work. The additional parts, as Jacob said, are copyrighted by (...) (25 years ago, 17-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.549)
|
|
| | Re: Merry Christmas from the Libertarian Party
|
| (...) Just a quickie here: This definition isn't "bloody": (URL) but I didn't see 80% mentioned in it. Rather, I saw the use of "exclusive" pretty much exclusively. 80% isn't exclusive, it isn't even close. So 80% share is NOT a monopoly. It's (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.549)
|
|
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.548)
|
|
| | Re: Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
|
| (...) Simplistic answer is that they DID have cash to spend, it was economic boycott that finally broke the "back of the bus" thing with buses, and was going to break down a great deal more quite soon. As for the legal barriers, Laws REQUIRING (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 2.548)
|
|
| | Re: Is the LDraw parts database free?
|
| (...) It's the fuzziness I dislike. I would like to see some clear legal terms for the use of the parts. About the "community created" parts library, not the ones made by James Jessiman, I agree with Larry Pieniazek that the GPL is a bit too (...) (25 years ago, 19-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 2.548)
|
