|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.931) |
|
| | Re: oh NO
|
| (...) Pre-Classic Borg Cardboardcube The Pre-Classic Borg cardboardcube, precursor to the infamous Borg Cube. Made of a cardboard alloy hull, and largely ABS superstructure, the PCB Cube did not fare well in combat, and was quickly replaced by (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
| |
| all, rights (score: 2.931) |
|
| | Re: Brickshelf.com A Possible Solution
|
| (...) Marc-- Sounds like a good idea. Heck, it sounds like a great idea at first blush. However... TLG is not in the website business. (Nor should they be.) They are working with NetDevil to create an MMOG (or whatever they call it); and their (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 2.929) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.927) |
|
|
| all, rights (score: 2.927) |
|
| | Re: LEGO wins in Chinese High Court
|
| China Court Backs Lego Copyright Claim By AUDRA ANG, Associated Press Writer January 21, 2003 BEIJING - As it opens to the world, China has vowed repeatedly to eliminate counterfeit and pirated products. The latest test of its commitment appears to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.926) |
|
| | LEGO wins in Chinese High Court
|
| Crossposted to lugnet.mediawatch ---...--- (...) BBC News Online Tuesday, 21 January, 2003, 13:16 GMT Lego Defeats the Chinese Pirates * photo caption: Children first got their hands on Lego bricks in 1958 Danish toy-maker Lego Company has won a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.925) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.924) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 2.923) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.923) |
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) I agree that existence is a property right (and truly the most fundamental one). This does imply a right to a place to exist. However, assuming that the resources of the universe are limited, clearly one doesn't have an unlimited right to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.922) |
|
| | Re: Poverty myths?
|
| (...) So the population density of inhabitable China would be roughly double which is still about half that of Taiwan and remains insignificant compared to Hong Kong. (...) Assuming that is actually where most of their whealth is derived, is it not (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.922) |
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) No addendum needed, and mostly the system is already there. Judges do have a lot of flexibility. Unfortunately, over the years they have been given less flexibility. Also, countersuits already handle some of the problems. Mostly what has to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.921) |
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) The box is already open. This proposed law is just reminding us that it is open. But we don't want to close it. Lawsuits are the civilized way of settling disputes. (...) But what basis do you use to hold the cat thrower responsible for his (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.920) |
|
| | Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
|
| (...) Hmm, if land is not a good, then what rules should govern trading it? If you always have a right to some land as part of your right to exist, then what stops you from "selling" your land, and then demanding a land grant because you're now (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) <snip> (...) I agree with Frank on this point. The contract isn't exactly a property (well, the paper and ink are, and the IP that goes into it may be, but the contract in the sense that Frank means is merely an agreement. The agreement itself (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |
|
|
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |
|
| | Re: Idiots, Part Deux
|
| (...) Apologies Frank, I was actually enjoying reading this particular thread, though it be waaay over my head. I was looking for Locke, Kant, and Hobbes to chime into the thread, but alas... You are probably right about the other--the lines have (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| rights, property (score: 2.919) |