To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  Search Results: all rights are property rights
 Results 541 – 560 of about 136000.
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds. 

Messages:  Full | Brief | Compact
Sort:  Prefer Newer | Prefer Older | Best Match

  Re: Pure Capitalism and Property Rights (was Re: People are idiots...)
 
(...) Dunno. I haven't found one yet that wasn't. (Meaning either a putative right is a property right, or it isn't a right) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.931)

  Re: oh NO
 
(...) Pre-Classic Borg Cardboardcube The Pre-Classic Borg cardboardcube, precursor to the infamous Borg Cube. Made of a cardboard alloy hull, and largely ABS superstructure, the PCB Cube did not fare well in combat, and was quickly replaced by (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jun-03, to lugnet.space, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.931)

  Re: Brickshelf.com – A Possible Solution
 
(...) Marc-- Sounds like a good idea. Heck, it sounds like a great idea at first blush. However... TLG is not in the website business. (Nor should they be.) They are working with NetDevil to create an MMOG (or whatever they call it); and their (...) (17 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
 

all, rights, property
(score: 2.929)

  Zolqwith Speed Suit / Photo by Todd Lehman
 
(URL) ·Zolqwith Speed Suit ·Base Plate Art ©2003 Eric Sophie. All rights reserved. ·Photograph ©2003 Todd Lehman. All rights reserved. (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)  
 

all, rights
(score: 2.927)

  Re: Zolqwith Speed Suit / Photo by Todd Lehman
 
(...) (URL) ·Zolqwith Speed Suit ·Base Plate Art ©2003 Eric Sophie. All rights reserved. ·Photograph ©2003 Todd Lehman. All rights reserved. (...) Thank you. Todd really captured the feel of the Speed Suit. I made this awhile ago, so its just a (...) (21 years ago, 10-Sep-03, to lugnet.publish.photography, FTX)
 

all, rights
(score: 2.927)

  Re: LEGO wins in Chinese High Court
 
China Court Backs Lego Copyright Claim By AUDRA ANG, Associated Press Writer January 21, 2003 BEIJING - As it opens to the world, China has vowed repeatedly to eliminate counterfeit and pirated products. The latest test of its commitment appears to (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.mediawatch)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.926)

  LEGO wins in Chinese High Court
 
Crossposted to lugnet.mediawatch ---...--- (...) BBC News Online Tuesday, 21 January, 2003, 13:16 GMT Lego Defeats the Chinese Pirates * photo caption: Children first got their hands on Lego bricks in 1958 Danish toy-maker Lego Company has won a (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.mediawatch)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.925)

  Re: Vague abstract debate that puts people to sleep?
 
(...) The whole "everything can be called property rights" seems so leaden to me. I won't argue it either way - it just seems like a game of semantics to me. What I could add is pendantic: Chris is right from a the single sale point on value, but (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.924)

  LDraw All-In-One-Installer - Seeking permission from software programmers
 
Dear contributor to the LDraw System Of Tools, We would like to include your program files listed below (the “Product”) in our new LDraw.org All-In-One-Installer, (the “Work”) to be published by LDraw.org: ___...___ Program The purpose of this (...) (17 years ago, 6-Aug-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)  
 

all, rights, property
(score: 2.923)

  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
Darn, wish I'd seen this note before posting a second ago. (...) That's how I see it too. But that is wicked, not good and just. (...) Convince me. (...) I'm not yet convinced. I'm not ready to accept as fact that humans exist in the unalterable (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.923)

  Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
 
(...) I agree that existence is a property right (and truly the most fundamental one). This does imply a right to a place to exist. However, assuming that the resources of the universe are limited, clearly one doesn't have an unlimited right to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.922)

  Re: Poverty myths?
 
(...) So the population density of inhabitable China would be roughly double which is still about half that of Taiwan and remains insignificant compared to Hong Kong. (...) Assuming that is actually where most of their whealth is derived, is it not (...) (22 years ago, 2-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.922)

  Re: Idiots, Part Deux
 
(...) No addendum needed, and mostly the system is already there. Judges do have a lot of flexibility. Unfortunately, over the years they have been given less flexibility. Also, countersuits already handle some of the problems. Mostly what has to (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.921)

  Re: Idiots, Part Deux
 
(...) The box is already open. This proposed law is just reminding us that it is open. But we don't want to close it. Lawsuits are the civilized way of settling disputes. (...) But what basis do you use to hold the cat thrower responsible for his (...) (22 years ago, 10-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.920)

  Re: Capitalism (was: People are idiots...)
 
(...) Hmm, if land is not a good, then what rules should govern trading it? If you always have a right to some land as part of your right to exist, then what stops you from "selling" your land, and then demanding a land grant because you're now (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

  Re: Idiots, Part Deux
 
(...) <snip> (...) I agree with Frank on this point. The contract isn't exactly a property (well, the paper and ink are, and the IP that goes into it may be, but the contract in the sense that Frank means is merely an agreement. The agreement itself (...) (22 years ago, 11-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Hmm, interesting question. Some problems I see: - If the other planet has biological or sentient inhabitants, we would have to decide just what their rights are. Hopefully we would recognize them... - I would have a concern as to how (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Hmm, another thought... If "rights" are a legal construct, where does "good and just" come from. Clearly we seem to feel there is some absolute measure of goodness and justness. Without such, you can't judge anyone else's actions. We probably (...) (22 years ago, 19-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

  Re: The nature of property (was: Idiots, Part Deux)
 
(...) Both. I have tried several times to bail out of .debate, but I've never really stopped reading. I do tend to skim some peoples posts, and I think I'm finally getting the self control to not respond to pointless debates, but I still read them. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

  Re: Idiots, Part Deux
 
(...) Apologies Frank, I was actually enjoying reading this particular thread, though it be waaay over my head. I was looking for Locke, Kant, and Hobbes to chime into the thread, but alas... You are probably right about the other--the lines have (...) (22 years ago, 13-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 

rights, property
(score: 2.919)

More:  Next Page >>


©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR