|
| |
|  
rights, property
(score: 3.142)
|
|
 | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) To answer this question you first have to answer two related and subordinate questions: Is the function that this facility carries out itself constitutional? If not, then requiring ID or not is a moot question since the facility SHOULD be (...) (23 years ago, 24-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 3.142)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.140)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.140)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 3.133)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.132)
|
|
| | Re: Ewoks, Yoda, Lobot pics at FBTB
|
| (...) Nah, they wouldn't--the Ewoks have the new Stubbies™ (1) instead of regular minifig legs. (...) See above. They appear to be new legs entirely, not a 1x2 hinge. I Could Be Wrong. But I agree that it's a combination of the two-- a head with (...) (23 years ago, 6-Nov-01, to lugnet.starwars)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.132)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) That is required to prevent claims from those who submit material to us. It is standard business practice (think of contests where people submit entries). To be clear, yes it does mean that you give up any and all rights to scans you submit to (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.128)
|
|
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Larry, hello everybody, (...) I do understand by now what was going on in the last few weeks, and why. However, there hasn't been much response to my second point, which was about Brickshelf L.L.C. claiming all rights with uploaded scans: (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.126)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.122)
|
|
| | Re: Views on asylum seekers?
|
| (...) Of course if tbey come in and don't respect property rights, they will find themselves detained, and possibly sent back where they came from. (...) And we have demonstrated that such collections are pretty effective, even as people complain (...) (23 years ago, 3-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.120)
|
|
| | Re: I am officially curious...
|
| (...) Insomniac Dave, present and accounted for! Seriously though, those of us who were @Home customers had a hellish week as far as internet access is concerned, so posting to LUGNET wasn't nearly as important as it usually is. I suspect this is (...) (23 years ago, 9-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.115)
|
|
| | Retry count too small for nqc linux usb driver
|
| Hi Thomas, I just found that the retry count for EAGAIN in RCX_USBTowerPipe_linux::Write() was too small (10) for handling the large packets used in firmware downloading. It ran out of retries middle way in sending the continue downloading command (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.112)
|
|
| | announcing the "My Own Creation" series
|
| (OK, not really an announcement, as the word is already out.... once again I am left in awe of the speed with which news travels*. But humor me for a moment.) LEGO Direct is extremely pleased to announce the launch of the "My Own Creation" series, (...) (23 years ago, 14-Dec-01, to lugnet.lego.direct) !!
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 3.111)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.110)
|
|
| | Re: The big lie
|
| (...) I'm still resolving that part of the issue for myself, but it puts me in mind of the other side of the coin: Since the airlines are primarily private corporations, and the aircraft are their property, they are well within their rights (correct (...) (23 years ago, 28-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.104)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Arguably, no. Not on a rights based calculus. But see Friedman (1) who argues that rights based calculus breaks down at the edges (asserting your right not to ingest one molecule of extra CO2 due to a car near but not on your property is a bit (...) (23 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.102)
|
|
| | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Yup. And some kind of licensing and proof of insurance will probably be part of that security. Incidentally, were I to be a road owner, one thing I would insist on is that drivers be insured in addition to vehicles. The vehicle isn't (usually) (...) (23 years ago, 10-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.100)
|
|
| | Re: Fatwah
|
| (...) Hmm. I don't think it's accurate to call this a band-wagon episode, unless we're accusing the LP of jumping on its *own* bandwagon. Whatever else can be said of the LP, they've been entirely consistent in their views regarding the right to (...) (23 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.099)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 3.099)
|
