|
 | | Small Stox Can Equal Big Returns.
|
| For attention. We found company ready to EXPLODE!! Put CGDC on your radar's now. This shows a significant up in price and sometimes in days, not months or years. Watch CGDC like a hawk Monday!! The alert is on!! CHINA GOLD CORP Sym: CGDC Current (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jun-06, to lugnet.build.arch)
| |
|  
all, property
(score: 1.143)
|
|
| | The Bull is Back in Select Small Caps
|
| For attention. We found company ready to EXPLODE!! Put CGDC on your radar's now. This shows a significant up in price and sometimes in days, not months or years. Watch CGDC like a hawk Monday!! The alert is on!! CHINA GOLD CORP Sym: CGDC Current (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jun-06, to lugnet.loc.us.ga)
| |
|
all, property
(score: 1.143)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| With every gun debate I see/read, it seems to me more people would rather live unarmed. I seems likely to me that, within my lifetime, guns will be outlawed from private citizens. Why do I think this likely? Because I just don't see enough people (...) (23 years ago, 23-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.142)
|
|
| | ??? (was Re: An armed society...(what if?))
|
| (...) LFB, Kirby is a little too conspiracy prone for my taste also (really, it's his one obvious debate flaw), but that doesn't mean that he is wrong -- the fact is, Kirby is right in most of the broader strokes of his statements, even if he screws (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.141)
|
|
| | Re: An armed society...(what if?)
|
| (...) So let's see, people who don't come to the same conclusion as you do, given the same evidence, are ignorant? No--rather, I'd argue that you've determined the "truth"--or the end conclusion--before you went out looking for evidence. I'm still (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.141)
|
|
| | Re: FOTY, at least for me.
|
| (...) But you see NC State is wrong. Even those people are doing a service. My former employer got season ticks to the Pistons one year, and they were more hapless than usual, winning hardly any important games. So it got to where the firm was (...) (23 years ago, 19-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.139)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.139)
|
|
| | Addressing concerns about Outsourcing LEGO Production
|
| This is the response Consumer Services is giving in response to today’s announcement: “LEGO Group to outsource major parts of its production to Flextronics” Thank you for letting us respond to you regarding our recent announcement about changes in (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jun-06, to lugnet.announce)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.138)
|
|
| | Plowed Ground
|
| (...) Speaking of which, you've mentioned previously that "all rights are property rights" or something to that effect. I won't ask you to rehash it all for me, but do you recall approximately when or in what context that was first discussed here? (...) (24 years ago, 9-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.138)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.137)
|
|
| |
|
rights, property
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| | Re: R21 - ROOM BOOKED Sat JULY 22 - Tug of WAR
|
| (...) Oh so true, and about all the gloating rights, right?? Oh if I could only have that right... (sigh) but when playing against the best bot builders that dream seems very far fetched. Speaking of the devil, I was just about to email you to ask (...) (18 years ago, 30-May-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| (...) What I actually said was this: (from) (URL)Tell you what though, Scott. Pick one point, one thought, one item that (...) and again: (from) (URL)I'll repeat my offer though. If Scott picks one point or small topic and (...) Note the use (in (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.136)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: What is a "review"?
|
| (...) I agree, changing a price tag could be considered fraud (though probably not technically, fraud is more like making a false claim). My point is that fraud is just as much a theft as if you directly take something. In the case of replacing a (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.135)
|
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) If you think they're worth doing, by all means, please go ahead. However since they involve transfers of wealth from one person to another, my position is that you ought to do them on your nickel, not mine. I am not my brother's keeper unless (...) (24 years ago, 7-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Rights, Who needs them? (was Re: Abortion...
|
| (...) Scott, of course, snipped the subordinate clause I put on there, the clause showing a balance of rights so that all rights are respected. As is his wont. Snip away what might disagree with your point or show that the other side is reasonable. (...) (24 years ago, 12-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.125)
|
|
| | Re: Selling MOC Instructions? Your Thoughts?
|
| (...) I think technically no. Again, I am not an atty. and this is not legal advice, but despite not having current access to Westlaw/Nexus/Lexus I have a fairly educated opinion about these things... Companies have copyrights, trademarks, and (...) (23 years ago, 19-Dec-01, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
all, rights, property
(score: 1.125)
|
|
| | Review of set 4766, Graveyard Duel
|
| [LEGOSet 4766] 4766 System / Harry Potter (and the Goblet of Fire) Graveyard Duel Duel au cimetière El Duelo en el Cementerio Ages 7-12, 548 Pcs. (C)2005. 56 page manual: 1 model (9 component models), 168 steps. Building time about 1 hour. Price (...) (18 years ago, 2-May-06, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.harrypotter, FTX)
| |
|
all, rights
(score: 1.125)
|
