 | | Re: Another way to market Lego Bricks
|
|
(...) has (...) You didn't read my original post close enough. The price would be the same as it is now for ordering through S@H. You would just indicate that you bought it because you went someone's party. The person buying the Legos pays the same. (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Very high-detail scans of the SW Collector's series sets
|
|
(...) I don't think those are worm gears. They look more like the flexible ribbed tubing that has been used in most Technic sets recently. Jeff (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Automatic decoupler designs?
|
|
OK, got it. Instructions even included. (...) chopper (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Has any one else noticed this lately?
|
|
(...) I've seen it too. Probably the same sort of thinking that says it's OK to remove price tags if you can thereby screw up the store pricing system and get a better deal. I have taken to checking very closely and taking stuff with flaws up, along (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Automatic decoupler designs?
|
|
I recall somebody posting pictures of a design that sounds like the below here (or maybe on RTL?--but I'm pretty sure it was here) not tooooo long ago. I think the stubby tapered beam can be had for example in the red Technic chopper that's been on (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you build sets you buy for parts?
|
|
(...) Ben, all LEGO sets are merely parts packs for my building! I have an obscene amount of the following that I have mostly1 never built: 6075 - 10 (Yellow Castle), never built a single one. 6382 - 5 (Fire Station), ditto. 760 - 35 (London Bus) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | LDAO 2.1.0 still beta?
|
|
Anyone know whether LDAO 2.1.0 is still in the "beta" stage? It's not up on Steve Bliss' LDAO page as the current version. What bugs still remain? James Wilson (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Motor output multiplexing
|
|
Hi Simon, I'd be interested in seeing what you've done. I'll be needing as many motors as I can get in the near future. Is there a web site? David Leeper (cannot have too many motors) (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Very high-detail scans of the SW Collector's series sets
|
|
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Steve Bliss (<D5l0OFetPfE0Nm+f3Z...@4ax.com>) wrote at 13:31:38 (...) No. Look at the port top wing. Third piece in from the left on the back end of the laser. It's got the hole for a leg on top, if you see what I mean. (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Reference Site Inconsistencies
|
|
I was cross-checking some information between LDraw/Partsref, Lutz Uhlmann's Parts Reference, and James Jessiman's Unofficial LEGO Parts Listing. I was specifically looking at the parts with number less than 1000[1], because I need to get a better (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Site
|
|
(...) The Construction Site is a store in Waltham Massachusetts. The best LEGO store I have ever been in! They do have a web site: (URL) have basically everything in current production and even a few sets from a couple of years ago that are out of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Construction Site
|
|
(...) The Construction Site is actually a small toy store in Waltham, Massachusetts that sells ONLY construction toys. And as you might guess, a large part of that is Lego. If you're not in MA, you can always see them online at (URL) ... they've got (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Construction Site
|
|
(I think the (...) What is the Contruction Site? I've never heard of it before, and now it's turned up about 5 times today all over LUGNet. Is it a website? I fit is, I *NEED* to know it's address. Someone please help! Karl Martinson (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: B-Wing Review
|
|
(...) I'll be the first to admit that none of the Lego EP1 sets hold a candle to the MOCs that have been posted here. (In fact, probably the only Lego SW set that holds its own with some folk's MOCS is the X-Wing.) I'm just saying that, for (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: B-Wing Review
|
|
(...) Actually, you have a very good point regarding the X-Wing & Snowspeeder. Here is how I'd rate the SW sets that I own: X-Wing: Best Model Interpretation. The X-Wing is the most accurate of all the ships, IMO Snowspeeder: Most Ingenious Use of (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: B-Wing Review
|
|
(...) I certainly am not. Both the A-Wing and B-Wing are awful models, IMO. They are tiny, flimsy and rather ugly, especially when compared to just about every MOC I've seen of them. Of course, I'm biased because of my MOCs, which are two of the (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights Kingdom King as a soldier?
|
|
(...) Not that it's necessarily worth it (but it's a thought).. if you're looking for helmets, there's always the FK castle accessories pack (I think the Construction Site still has them, for pretty cheap)... that comes with the black bullet and (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: What all has TLC done?
|
|
(...) last year, and it was weak. Just after posting that message, I saw some really useful parts on some SW sets, esp. the Sith Infiltrator. But, I'd never want a TIE viewport. Maybe I'll just get hold of a TIE Interceptor instead. But, I'll never (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you build sets you buy for parts?
|
|
(...) Nope. In fact, of the thousands of sets that I've bought, I think I'm still in single digits for the number of sets I've actually built. Off the top of my head they include: The Landspeeder 6078 6090 6086 (bought that used) 6067 4559 Probably (...) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Knights Kingdom King as a soldier?
|
|
(...) Excellent ideas! I am definitly going to steal some of them (Ideas that is) once I get a few more Kings. Thanks, Eric K. The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 6-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
