To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *89905 (-20)
  Re: Yellow Supercar on Lego.com
 
(...) I think it was probably a mistake. I wouldn't expect them to do this knowingly. BTW, I liked the middle car best. Fredrik (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: 8448 there are no brakes !!!!!
 
(...) None that I know of. But there is a sketch for a vehicle with brakes in an old idea book. Look at page 63 in the 8888 idea book. For example in (URL) do you expect the Supercar to have brakes? There are many other things it lacks, such as (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: best set for micromotors, pneumatics
 
Hi Iain, Richard is correct about it being a air device . I put Hydraulic in qoutes because there was much discussion about Lego advertizing a "Hydraulic" action when no real fluid is involved, unless you count air as a fluid. the New part works (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  IDE using Forth ?
 
How about a Forth based environment running on the PC? It would not be that difficult to move the RCX based compiler to be a cross compiler on the PC. One would be able to run in two modes - "native" through a Forth based terminal (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
 
(...) After spending another two nights with NQC & RcxCC (:-), another wish came up in my mind quite clearly: I use the "Watching the RCX" tool window quite frequently for debugging, and I'd find it great if it could display the *names* of the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: What should be in the next version of RcxCC
 
How about a more generalized interface to the pbForth system. Although Ralph Hempel believes this to be unnecessary, I find the RcxCC interface quite appealing. Harald Striepe (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
 
  Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...
 
(...) That's from Matt's "Track Designer" program, I think... --grin-- JohnG, GMLTC (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: 8448 there are no brakes !!!!!
 
Seriously though.....why are there no brakes ? Are there any models that have brakes ? And has any Lego Wizard (Dave Baum are you there ?) motorised the automatic gearchange.....then you could control eveything via RIS Regards Tim Wilkins (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics)
 
  Re: Yellow Supercar on Lego.com
 
(...) Its definitely a different picture, but probably the same car. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: best set for micromotors, pneumatics
 
The "new" part is a spring powered air "controled" device. It looks like an oversized technic "shock absorber". But is uses a pneumatic plunger with limited air flow to slow the movement. -Rich (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: 8448 there are no brakes !!!!!
 
(...) I think you throw it in reverse to stop. (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Building a Mini-fig Army, how much to pay
 
(...) my most valued accessories (i.e., the ones I hoard mercilessly): - black sword (Armor Shop) - Crusader flag (Armor shop) - black 2x2x3 (I think) tower top (Black Falcon's Fortress) - Black Falcon flag (Black Falcon's Fortress) - gray treasure (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: Yellow Supercar on Lego.com
 
I'm pretty sure that the car couldn't have been built outside of Lego. Consider all of those yellow "axles" (both flexible and normal). All of the flexible ones I've seen in real sets have little ridges near the ends. I don't see any ridges in the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: best set for micromotors, pneumatics
 
(...) mentioned Since I havn't seen this set up close I have to wonder... Surely this can't really be a LEGO Hydraulic system, to parallel the pneumatic system? Have I missed something? Iain -- tokama (URL) UIN 5362826 AIM Linjerflyg h e n d r y j r (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
 
  Re: Im thinking of creating a KIDLUG
 
(...) That is indeed a great idea. I'm sure a lot of people would love it. (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.org.us)
 
  Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...
 
One question, why all the black 2x2 plates between track sections?? (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Building a Mini-fig Army, how much to pay
 
(...) Here is my quick list (feel free to add, contradict, and subtract): Most (by virtue of being unique): White Maiden's hat (from 6023) Black sword (From 6041 Armor Shop) The old school visors from the yellow castle Black Falcons Flag The (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
 
  Re: "Just Build" at www.lego.com
 
Todd, Gee... thanx for the compliments on my Java-Brix-Builder. I never thought to mention it earlier. I had originally programmed it to attract the attention of the folks who designed the legolandca.com website (they had been using some of my (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.cad)
 
  RE: Thought on pbForth
 
(...) Wow! Great company indeed! (...) This would be a good idea, and one day, pbForth will get there. I used to ship a Tcl based shell with pbForth, but it wasn't working well on all platforms. Here's why pbForth is the way it is, and forgive the (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
 
  Re: Element Count Trivia
 
(...) ---- Subtotal 653 (...) ---- Subtotal of 'real' Lego ;=) 1397 ----- Grand Total 2050 This is not a good example to set for kids. Even if the remaining 122 are "miscellaneous" (Throwbots?), it would be good to mention them in a near-exhaustive (...) (25 years ago, 2-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)

Skipped 12 messages in groups lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.geek (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR