 | | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) having it be a brick will make it easier to make a carbon freezing chamber- it will fit into a slot better. I'm playing with some ideas- Han goes down, turn it around and up pops frozen Han. Any other ideas on how to do this? Chris (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) Well, space helmets have to be removed before you can turn your astronauts' heads, which in the vacuum of space isn't very practical, either! 8^) Dave! (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) I feel good. And, I knew that I would! Mike (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) How insulting! (...) Actually, the paint could wear off. Then you'd be fresh out of a Han Solo carbonyte piece, or a stupid-looking one, at that. Mike (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) <Snipped muchly> I don't precisely like it as is, but I'm fairly certain I would get positively *sick* of it the other way (as a molded sarcaphogus type piece). I mean, as is, I can at least us it as a brick - the other way, it's never going (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Cross posting in eu (was: Aaargh!)
|
|
(...) IMHO, I don't agree. I'd surely be quite upset finding a non-english (and non-italian of course :-) message in loc.eu I see cross-posting as a great advantage, but I can't see the advantage of writing in other languages in this NG... Every (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.eu, lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: c'e' gente simpatica in giro che non ha nulla di buono da fare
|
|
(...) "Just a polite enlightenment." dice Eric. In effetti, non ho trovato minimamente offensivo il suo post, che anzi può esserci utile per ricordare di controllare il cross-posting. Aggiungo come parere personale che mi darebbe abbastanza fastidio (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Slave-I factoids!
|
|
(...) I'm going to don my asbestos armor here and say that I *like* the way they did Han in carbonite. It feels very... lego-correct, whereas a complicated molded piece would be... clunky. I dunno. I still haven't seen the set (augh!) so I'll shut (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
|
|
(...) Netscape 4.5 Italiano. Stesso problema. Ciao Giulio (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Electric Clutch
|
|
(...) Closest thing that comes to mind is the #5120 Polarity Switch - that would be a mechanical way to control electric power. LEGO had a Technic set (#8082) a couple of years ago with directions to a model that used a micro-motor to turn the (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pubblicizzare ItLUG nei negozi?
|
|
(...) Bene, cambialo pure :-) Scherzo, voglio dire, se credi che modificato possa andare meglio, sei libero di farlo; non credo che necessariamente il volantino debba essere identico in tutta Italia. Magari ognuno di noi può integrarlo, se ha tempo (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: How to break up multi-dat files?
|
|
I don't think that MLCad is able to show anything but X'es for sub-models (= document) at this moment. Djelle alias Mogens Sørensen ___...___ E-mail - Home: Djelle@Get2Net.dk ICQ: 38701158 J G Gregory <jgg@ultranet.com> wrote in message (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
|
Thank you for your response -- we appreciate it. (...) I can agree with and respect your other points, especially regarding the retailer's catalog. That makes sense. However, this one doesn't. There is no legal precedent for this, but this sort of (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Pastel = Profit (Was Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?)
|
|
Yep, and I'll respect that statement. But I certainly WON'T agree with it. Putting pics on an open website and then saying "hey don't look at those" is NOT the way to run a website. Don't put them there in the first place, if you don't want them (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 LEGO
|
|
(...) I'm keeping my eyes open for the Star Wars sets, but I'm not really in any hurry. Just as well, I don't need to spend the money yet. doubt -- Douglas Triggs -- doubt@lensflare.com -- "Come, muse, let us sing of rats!" Sysadmin, Astronomer, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.us.co)
|
| |
| | Lego Electric Clutch
|
|
Is there a such thing as a Lego (Electric) clutch ? This could reduce the number of motors required .. Thanks in advance Sandeep (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Another new group idea
|
|
(...) Oooo, good idea. Especially since clone brands are *off*-topic, they're more like, well, anti-topic. ;) Steve (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: "Fixing" movable dividers in Plano boxes
|
|
I've completed my experiments with Goop. It's an adhesive that comes in many different iterations (I've used the "shoe" and "automotive" varieties and they both seemed like the same... er... goop) and claims itself to be "stronger than glue!" if you (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.storage)
|
| |
| | Re: (Failed) Getting LegOS 0.2.2 working on Windows
|
|
(...) The original loader.c doesn't compile, due to O_ASYNC (and other stuff) - worked around in the patch for Windows folks. No help there ... I did some poking and experimentation, and here's a tad more info: - The "Invalid argument" error happens (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Another part variation
|
|
(...) Augh! You're right! I've got three different versions, right here on my desk. Specifically, I've got: Brown tree trunks, height = 44LDU, no internal teeth/tabs Brown tree trunks, height = 40LDU, no internal teeth/tabs Black tree trunks, height (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.general)
|
