To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *76281 (-10)
  Re: Fremont meeting - Should I stay or should I go now...
 
Well, it sounds like there will be three or four of us, so I guess we're still on for Saturday. It'll be an intimate gathering, but so much the better for that. ;-) I'm also planning to attend on the 4th of DEC, which will be the following weekend (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ca.sf)
 
  Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
 
(...) Here's part of the disclaimer I've already attached in the zip-file: I know my efforts may seem like heresy to a number of AFOL's, and I apologize for any stepped-on toes. Let me state plainly that the pieces included here are ABSOLUTELY (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
 
  Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
 
(...) Sorry Frank Deeppockets Filz, (you always outbid me on eBay!) but there is at least one other who is making modules - me. I am trying to get people in California to have an LTC here, but have been too busy at work to really push it right now. (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: copier. (datsville press - copier.dat )
 
(...) uhhh... i think i smell a potential powder keg brewing here... (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
 
  Re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
John Neal wrote in message <383B2665.A4C40D72@u...st.net>... (...) I think that would be a good idea, however, I also think that we should continue to pursue NMRA recognition. LEGO trains are a valid model railroading segment (as the NMRA president (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Junk Box 1 Log
 
(...) <snipped in & out list> Its arrived and gone along it's merry way through the north country... (this post is a couple days overdue, but I've been lazy about updating. The box should arrive at it's next recipient within the next day or two) The (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
 
  Re: LTMA vs NMRA
 
(...) On the idea of Rivtek or other brands, they can only help our cause, not hurt them. I actually have 3 tyco elements I use in my Lego creations because they are an awesome piece TLC never came up with. It adds to the realism of the creations. (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
 
(...) If you were sensing any "hostility" it was just a little bit. :^) The "come off it phrase" is like saying "give me a break". While reading my last comment you must imagine me grinning and speaking sarcastically. That's just my way of replying (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
 
Jim Rorstrom wrote in message ... (...) junk. (...) a (...) at (...) the (...) Well, the cost depends very much on whether you require all the scenery to be LEGO pure. The GMLTC layout would be far more expensive to create than a similar quality HO (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
 
(...) Count me in the minority, then. Making parts is hard. If someone wants to make parts I say more power to them. Perhaps making clone parts will refine their modeling skill, which has to be a good thing for all of us. I understand the issues but (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)

Skipped 1 message in group lugnet.off-topic.debate (Skip-filter settings)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR