 | | Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
|
|
(...) There may be no functional difference, but they're very different things. A domain name certainly _isn't_ any old DNS entry. A DNS entry can be a lot of things -- an MX record, a CNAME, etc. Some DNS entries are for host names. Those get A (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Good vs. Evil
|
|
(...) well, my castle scenarios have lots of women & babes (about four guys to every girl) but about half of these chicks are lesbians, so the men are still pretty restless at night.(could be fun <snicker>) visitors to my site know what kind of (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
|
|
(...) Sure. But a FQDN is different from a "domain name". That's what the "Fully-Qualified" part is there for. :) FQDN = host name + domain name. Therefore, by definition, host name is not a part of domain name. (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: [Datsville] Renovated House with Porch, Includes a Yard
|
|
Jeff Stembel <Dragonelf1@aol.com> wrote in message news:FIqHC1.2L3@lugnet.com... (...) Jeff, since this is rather different than the first house w/ porch, would you mind if I repainted the original and just added this one elsewhere in Datsville? I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego at Gerf.Org
|
|
(...) It could be. But it could also be a host name. I appeal to the FOLDOC: <URL:(URL) "domain" is most commonly used to refer to a group of computers whose hostnames share a common suffix, the domain name. The last component of this is the (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: truck wheels: 5563 vs 5571
|
|
(...) Who said the 5571 isn't? Well, maybe not "dumb" but certainly annoying. One of the most realistic (looking) retail sets TLG has ever produced, other than the stupid wheels. Never have gone back to retro-fit mine, though I did pick up extra (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.modelteam)
|
| |
| | Re: Don Quixote puts away his lance (was Re: McDonalds set
|
|
(...) I honestly don't know, I just read it again and I wasn't sure. But under my rather strict morality, anything that I do with intent to evade a clear prohibition that I have agreed to abide by(1), is not OK, no matter if it's explicitly (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Stereogram (see it in 3D!)
|
|
(...) I think anyone can do it by simply moving the camera a couple inches to the right or left... how far you move it affects how far away the objects pictured appear. This makes it fairly easy to do for still life photos, (like lego set-ups) but (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 LEGO Star Wars and more!
|
|
(...) Leave it to me to get nitpicked after nitpicking others :) Actually, I went to the www.starwars.com to get the length, since I didn't know it offhand, so I guess 27 is the 'official' length? (not that it means too much in practice :) ) I (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO Stereogram (see it in 3D!)
|
|
(...) Does your camera have a special feature that enables you to take stereo pics or is it a technique anyone can try? If so, how did you set up the shot? (...) (25 years ago, 27-Sep-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
|
