 | | Whats wrong with Brickshelf?
|
|
Hi all, Some of our club members noticed that it's no longer possible to upload to Brickshelf. Anyone any idea whats happening? Thanks Ludo (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing voltage
|
|
(...) Hello, you can put AC or DC voltage at the input of the regulator with no problem as long as you don't put more than 9VAC~14VDC. The internal circuit will take both. So a quick fix that put 4.5~5V DC at the input will ouput about 3~3.2VDC at (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing voltage
|
|
(...) I think this is how you want to do it. A simple solution would be to go to Radio Shack, and buy a couple large ceramic resistors. (not sure the values you'd want, but something low). Then, take a normal 9v wire, cut it, and insert the (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Reducing voltage
|
|
(...) Years ago PNLTC used to do this for the kids table at the show. From what I recall, we just drove a screw though the controller at about the 4th notch in the black area on each side to keep it from turning too far. It is a very long lasting, (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Pulling power of different train systems
|
|
That's interesting stuff! Thanks for sharing the info. Scott W. (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Reducing voltage
|
|
Our club lets kids run the controller for one of the lines when we do certain events (like, right now, with Detroit Festival of Trees), but we could use a way to forcibly limit the speed on the line that they're allowed to run. One way that's really (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) By no means worse than mine. I'll try to contact Martin Svensson (now Palmberg) about the Post office building. I'm certain he has no objections that we use his work. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | [FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group] Les nouveautés dimanche 22 novembre 2009
|
|
Bonjour Voici la lettre d'information du site "FreeLUG : French Enthusiast LEGO(c) User Group" ((URL) lettre recense les articles et les brèves publiés depuis 1 jours. Nouveaux articles ---...--- ** Le village Duplo de Jeanne ** par danielle (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.org.fr.freelug)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) That's an interesting question to ponder. When LEGO-scale Mega Bloks came onto the scene, they filled a gap that LEGO had left open. Namely, MB produced simple sets with large quantities of basic elements in unusual colors, such as military (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) Happens now and again. As I recall, toy vehicles that transformed into robots were marketed in the USA with almost no success, but Hasbro took the idea, attached a story line to it, and an animated show, and it took off like wildfire. I expect (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LSynth 3.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) default was "(Default)", instead of LSynth or something similar. I'm not sure if it matters, but this was in Windows 7. --Travis (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Message from Doug Bell regarding Electronic Thinking
|
|
Hi Everyone, It was great seeing all of you at the SMART meeting on Saturday. One of the things that came up at the meeting was Doug Bell's new involvement in the company Electronic Thinking. Doug asked me to forward the message below about some (...) (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.org.us.smart, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes. Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) Is it an official part? Why isn't it included with the official distribution? Mike (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
|
(...) I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in the calling Type 1 line. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version. There are also some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
|
(...) tanders.dat - Original title "My Home", made by me, free to use under any license. It was originally built in BlockCAD when the world travelling minifigs Colin & Wanda visited me in 1999. (URL) - Original title "My little summer house", but (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) You're assuming that TLC actually took cues from MB in terms of how to fix their business model. In terms of the AFOL market, all it meant to TLC was that their customers stopped buying as much stuff, not that they started buying the (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO® Launches Battle Over Trademark
|
|
(...) Here's a better question. If that had been the case, would anyone have even had the desire to attempt to clone MB at all? There are several different construction toy systems out there, and so far the only one I've really seen any non-bootleg (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.mediawatch, FTX)
|
