Subject:
|
Re: LGPL Datsville
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:59:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11353 times
|
| |
|
|
On 11/22/2009 5:58 PM, Michael Horvath wrote:
> Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL
> or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she
> must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version.
> There are also some restrictions on selling the modified work, and
> differences regarding whether or not they need to provide the source
> code when asked (which doesn't really apply here). In the public domain,
> if a person makes changes to your model, he or she doesn't have to allow
> other people (including you) to use the changed version if they don't
> want to, and they can sell both the original and changed versions
> without any restriction. They also don't have to say that you made the
> original, and that they just made small changes to it (though I'm not
> sure whether they can say that you *didn't* make the original).
Sorry. I just reread that and it's full of grammar mistakes.
Mike
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) By no means worse than mine. I'll try to contact Martin Svensson (now Palmberg) about the Post office building. I'm certain he has no objections that we use his work. /Tore (15 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LGPL Datsville
|
| (...) Well, the main difference (I think) is that if someone modifies a LGPL or CC work and distributes it on the Internet or something, he or she must also allow other people to do the same with their modified version. There are also some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
