Subject:
|
Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Wed, 3 Mar 2010 23:34:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
25942 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> > On 11/22/2009 7:03 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > > I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
> > > will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
> > > the calling Type 1 line.
> > >
> > > /Tore
> >
> > Is it an official part?
>
> After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part.
> There are more of them in Datsville.
>
> > Why isn't it included with the official distribution?
>
> If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not
> have been submitted to the Tracker. Those two x772p???.dat parts must be made
> from existing LEGO parts, but I don't think anyone has made a better version of
> them yet to submit to the Tracker.
>
> /Tore
Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/40764264@N02/4405232940/
The orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in
undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other
roadplates.
/Tore
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
| (...) After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part. There are more of them in Datsville. (...) If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not have been submitted to the Tracker. Those (...) (17 years ago, 23-Nov-09, to lugnet.cad)
|
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
