To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cadOpen lugnet.cad in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / 17004
17003  |  17005
Subject: 
Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad
Date: 
Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:54:50 GMT
Viewed: 
16174 times
  
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
<insert scissors here>
I'd like to suggest:
3651.dat    Technic Connector Peghole to Bush with 2 Studs
32039.dat   Technic Connector Axlehole to Axlehole
6553.dat    Technic Connector Axlehole to Axle
32013.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axlehole #1
32034.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #2 (180 degree)
32016.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #3 (157.5 degree)
32192.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #4 (135 degree)
32015.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #5 (112.5 degree)
32014.dat   Technic Connector Peghole to Axleholes #6 (90 degree)

<insert scissors here>

Chris Dee

I myself would rather like to see something like Cross Blocks. My suggestion
would be:

3651.dat  - Technic Connector (Pin/Bush) with  2 Studs
32039.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Bush)
6553.dat  - Technic Connector (Axle) with Axle 1.5
32013.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin) #1
32034.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin/Axle) #2 (180 degree)
32016.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin/Axle) #3 (157.5 degree)
32192.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin/Axle) #4 (135 degree)
32015.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin/Axle) #5 (112.5 degree)
32014.dat - Technic Connector (Axle/Pin/Axle) #6 (90 degree)

These are also a little bit shorter.. though not much.

-Santeri



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
 
(...) It makes sense, and has the benefit of homogeneous naming with cross blocks. Philo (15 years ago, 4-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)

Message is in Reply To:
  Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation
 
In (URL) Philo wrote "Speaking of rationalization, I would be very happy if we could find a coherent naming scheme for parts 3651, 32039, 6553 (and 32013?) - I can't possibly remember 6553 name...". So here is a first suggestion: Currently we have: (...) (15 years ago, 26-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)  

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR