Subject:
|
Re: Technic Beams vs. Liftarms (was Technic Axle Connectors - naming rationalisation)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:16:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
16572 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Chris Dee wrote:
> In lugnet.cad, Jetro de Chateau wrote:
> > I appreciate your work on this, but I wonder if there aren't other more
> > important changes (albeit probably more difficult ones) that would be of more
> > benefit to the community. I'm referring particularly to the present dichotomy of
> > Beams and Liftarms and their internal inconsistencies which fairly drives me
> > crazy any time I try to build something with LDraw.
> > Jetro
>
> I am surprised by this renewed criticism of the Technic Beam naming as we have
> worked very hard on resolving that issue over the past few releases. Is your
> library up-to-date?
> Chris Dee
Chris,
My sincerest apologies for my remark - After double checking I realized that
although I had installed the latest updates, I had not purged the unofficial
files from the directories and started looking for liftarms to only find half...
Thank you (and anyone else who collaborated) for a magnificent job. I half
expected everything to become liftarm, but I see the wisdom in choosing the
general name Beam since it will also place those beams next to the bricks they
are so often used with. Thanks again!
Jetro
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
