Subject:
|
Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:59:10 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
11141 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Michael Horvath wrote:
> On 11/22/2009 7:03 PM, Tore Eriksson wrote:
> > I've checked this out now, and you can't replace 606p01b.dat with 606p01.dat. It
> > will not come out with the same colors, regardless which main color you use in
> > the calling Type 1 line.
> >
> > /Tore
>
> Is it an official part?
After searching Peeron and BrickLink, I think that this is not a real LEGO part.
There are more of them in Datsville.
> Why isn't it included with the official distribution?
If it is an existing LEGO part (which I tend to doubt), the .dat file may not
have been submitted to the Tracker. Those two x772p???.dat parts must be made
from existing LEGO parts, but I don't think anyone has made a better version of
them yet to submit to the Tracker.
/Tore
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 606p01b.dat (Was: LGPL Datsville)
|
| (...) Maybe we can replace them after all. Look at this picture: (URL) orange poles indicate the occurances of x606p01b.dat. They are all in undeveloped areas, so I think it's possible to replace them with other roadplates. /Tore (15 years ago, 3-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
58 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
