 | | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
(...) Too bad... for 100USD (100EUR here in the old world) it should have a motor... with no motor this set gets too pricey. And I also think that the main image, picturing a motor, is misleading. I'm a bit disappointed. G. (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Gianluca Morelli" <poldoshop@yahoo.it> wrote in message news:JDoyM7.EJH@lugnet.com... (...) The motor is not included in the box. Look closely at this image: (URL) the lower right hand corner there is a picture of a 9v train motor and some track. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
What about the motor? The swiss crocodile looks motorized, but there's no motor in the parts list... (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Working Theme Park Ride: Enterprise
|
|
(URL) The "Enterprise" is a ride seen in many theme parks. It consists of a wheel with passenger cars along its edge. During the ride, the wheel spins and is raised up to the vertical. It has seating for 24 mini-figs and is painted as "The (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.announce.moc, lugnet.technic, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
"Mike Walsh" <mike_walsh@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:JDowF1.G1y@lugnet.com... (...) I will go ahead and pre-answer one question which I am pretty sure someone will pose: Q: Why are their two versions of the box? A: Like many LEGO sets, (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | 10183 LEGO Hobby Trains on ILTCO
|
|
ILTCO has received some images of the new 10183 LEGO Hobby Train. (URL) you are not familiar with the LEGO Hobby Train (aka UTB), you can read some background information in this thread: (URL) first public announcement of the 10183 LEGO Hobby Train (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) Or maybe just wrap the calls inside a mutex, so at least the behaviour is defined, if not optimum. Many of the NBC/NXC macros do exactly that, maybe all of them should? ROSCO (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) I understand his confusion. Not allowing separate threads to call the same subroutine is certainly unexpected. The concept of "thread" conventionally involves separate stacks for local variables (and a shared global state -- unlike separate (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Two motors at the same time... It is possible?
|
|
(...) It is possible. The NXC API doesn't currently wrap this capability in a really simple function. (...) The RotateMotor API function calls a subroutine written in NBC that does not return until the tachometer limit target has been reached. (...) (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
(...) The simplest answer is to stretch a cylinder to approximate the shape of the NXT cable. Kevin (19 years ago, 19-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
|
(...) This is very cool! It seems obvious now you've highlighted it, but I could never have spotted it. (I can't wait to use it in practice!) Thanks for sharing! Cheers Richie Dulin (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
|
(...) Indeed. Wider bricks/plates do result in a correspondingly larger gap though. ROSCO (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
|
(...) For the sake of completeness, it's worth to mention this technique not only works for any length, but also for any width of plate/brick. In other words, you're able to slant ? x 2, ? x 4 and so on by mirroring along the diagonal as well, using (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | From Jared Burks AKA Kaminoan
|
|
Jared has set up his Lugnet account, but hasn't been able to make a post yet (Rene, could you look into this?). I've been asked to post this for him: Well I haven't posted here, but I am guessing that many of you know me from other boards. Here is (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.general, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I have a dream...
|
|
(...) I've been corrected, there _is_ and 8-wide model pictured on the box, just not the front ;) (...) I'll see what kind of information I can get, but I just learned that there is a picture of the box on page 15 (17 in the pdf) of BrickJournal 6. (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
|
(...) Note that this technique is used in the nose of the UCS X-wing over a length of 28 studs: [LEGOSet 7191] ROSCO (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge wall alignment
|
|
(...) Excellent application of mathematics skills! Geometry is terribly underrated. Thanks! Olof (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | LSynth NXT cable segment
|
|
I could have sworn there was an NXT cable segment for LDraw available somewhere but for the life of me I can't find it now. Was I dreaming? (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Accountability of "Key Positions": Call for Public Discussion and Consensus
|
|
Willy Tschager schrieb: (...) snip (...) snip (...) I agree overall to your thoughts. This is a good step for the future. We should bring this point in a fast way to go. Michael Heidemann (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Elenco iscritti ItLUG: adeguamento normativo
|
|
Questa potrebbe essere l'informativa sulla privacy da inserire nel sito ItLUG. Bisogna stabilire una persona che si occupa del database e che risponde ad eventuali richieste di aggiornamento/cancellazione dei dati. Potrebbe occuparsene il webmaster (...) (19 years ago, 18-Feb-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
