 | | Re: Sector 4 Tribunal
|
|
(...) I always struggle to find the words to describe your MOCs, Keith. I'm just going to say that this one is good. Very, very, very good. :-) I really like all the small details, such as the black ball-joints used as surveillance dome cameras, and (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Duplicating problem in MPD rendering
|
|
(...) Brian, Do any of the sub-assemblies use the buffer exchange feature? When using an mpd file and this feature, you can run into problems when rendering the main assembly if you ghost the wrong parts or forget to ghost other parts in the (...) (19 years ago, 19-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
For some reason, I think that everyone at TLG (lawyers included) is preoccupied with the corporate downsizing this year. I had repeated requests for LEGO lawyer involvement with the LEGO CD, but never got a single reply. The folks in the LEGO (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Legofest di Ballabio: on-line le piantine aggiornate
|
|
Sono on-line le piantine aggiornate, fatemi sapere se sono necessarie ulteriori modifiche. Ciao Marco (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
(...) Well, I guess we probably won't know if Lego approved or disapproved... All we know is that if they DID disapprove, they didn't have the will or the ability to back it up! It would be odd if they approved, though-- especially since their use (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Lego name used in Scientific American
|
|
I note that in the February Issue of Scientific American there is an article entitled "MOLECULAR LEGO". And within the article a side bar reference to "Nano Lego". I am very surprised that TLG tend to encourage us to not use their name and yet (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.mediawatch)
|
| |
| | Re: Sector 4 Tribunal
|
|
(...) Sorry I'm late . . . . Excellent MOC. It is a great mix of three themes and gives lots of ideas for all. From a town perspective, I just love the interior pics. Interiors are something I don't do enough of, but the more I see of them . . . (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.space, lugnet.town, lugnet.build.mecha, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology
|
|
(...) You know, if this was an international forum, you'd at least expect the second letter of Jürgen's name to print properly... Jason R (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Text Based Programming for NXT - pbLua is Available
|
|
Hi Ralph, it's great to see this. I'm eager to have a play. Apologies if I've been part of the bother with sending you emails. In releasing details of your toolset, are you revealing your source code too? Both would be an enormous help to people (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology
|
|
(...) Double A-Hem! Dave K (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Apology
|
|
(...) Ahem. Jürgen (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: French Toy Fair 2007 : pictures !
|
|
Hi, LEGO France asked to us to remove the pictures of upcoming sets. So the pictures are no more available on FreeLUG and on the mirrors. Please do the same. Thank you everyone. Erik (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.year.2007, FTX)
|
| |
| | Duplicating problem in MPD rendering
|
|
I noticed when I render a multi part document using L3PAO and Povray it seems to make a duplicate ghost of some of the parts. The document has four models: - Complete assembly - Subassembly 1 - Subassembly 2 - Subassembly 3 The complete assembly (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Fabbrica di auto
|
|
Spettacolare.. la tua sarà più bella, peccato che alcune inquadrature lasciassero a desiderare. Lo so che non è complesso programmare un robot che faccia sempre le stesse cose, senza interazioni dall'esterno, ma lo trovo lo stesso ingegnoso. GAetano (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: comments
|
|
(...) When you do that, I recommend you not only test the 9 "on-brick" programming options on the page, but also the 18 "off-brick" programming tools, even if they're not allowed in FLL. :) Woops, guess I shouldn't have told you how many there are. (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) Iain- Got a picture without the RCX on top? -Rob A> (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: comments
|
|
We seem to be avoiding the real issue here. This free exchange of hard gained knowledge has got to stop. Haven't you guys ever heard of the computer preisthood? What is the rationale for spending hours searching for alternative programming tools, (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: [steve@teamhassenplug.org: Re: Apology]
|
|
(...) Hmm. I'm not sure who you're upset about here, but I think this was a heart-felt effort on the part of two people to apologize for slights, real or imagined, that occured in a public forum. In other words, they both seem to be behaving in a (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: comments
|
|
Ted, I'm not totally sure what you're saying, or why you felt the need to put my e-mail address in the subject line, but I believe the discussion is pretty much resolved. The page that's available: (URL) is pretty complete, and pretty informative. (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed Assembly Line Project
|
|
(...) Continuing along with that thought, how cool would this be? If I remember right, you showed me that the new train wheels have a technic axle hole in them. If we could get enough of those wheels (Bricklink, maybe?), then we wouldn't have to use (...) (19 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
