 | | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) Kevin, you are absolute right! LEGO you have exactly the following time quantums (I listed several for convience) to deliver those MDP NXT sets! 17 days 415 hours 24901 minutes 1494113 seconds (URL) in, breath out, wax on, wax off... -aps (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Parts Out of Context
|
|
It would be interesting to see if you have found ways to use parts in an environment totally different from what it was meant to be in. Like some cute single-purpose Scala utensil in a sci-fi scene or some hopeless Duplo block... well somewhere, I (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) Alexander, I nominate you as our official counter downer..... tomorrow will only be 17 days (two weeks+three days, that is 408 hours). Are you gonna burst?!?!?! Kev (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) Thanks Kevin! Hey, worst case scenario, I wait till the Fall. I actually now feel better cause I have filtered any emails with the words LEGO or NXT in them! Btw, according to the original MDP page, it claimed that all MDP participants would (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) Alexander, Keep breathing.... in through the nose, out through the mouth..... in through the nose, out through the mouth.... LOL! 18 days until the end of February... Keep up the excitement! Kev (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) And today, I got an email from LEGO Shop! But it was a normal advertisement...ahhhhhhh! :)! -aps (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
Allan, You seem to be assuming that LEGO tossed out the applicant list and pciked whomever they wanted. Why do you think that? I hate to say it, but it is obvious that reputation matters. Look at the original four MUPs. They have fantastic (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
(...) Nothing more? But, your list still has 300 names on it. You can compare it to the lottery, but wouldn't it be better to compare it to applying for a job? (as a developer?) Steve (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Nic_1
|
|
(...) Calculation time is very short -regarded the H8 limits- On the video and the program diagram you can conclude that the robot turns about every 2 seconds. Deduce the 0.8 sec pause and you have something around 1.2 seconds for a (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Working solar powered rover and geiger counter
|
|
(...) Wow, why do I think this has the potential for extreme pain? In any case, I'm very interested in anything you can provide for the rest of us. You've done some really nice work, that the rest of us would now like to copy :-). (...) That's (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MDP Status
|
|
"Steve Hassenplug" <steve@teamhassenplug.org> wrote in message news:IuH5uw.1GI2@lugnet.com... (...) I would have made a list of the requirements of those who I wanted to be part of the project, then I would have cross-reference this list with the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Working solar powered rover and geiger counter
|
|
(...) This would not be difficult - if you scroll down to the bottom schematic, it is colour-coded into sections according to function, with the last third of the circuit being all that you need to make a switch to activate and run the RCX from some (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Max
|
|
(...) Hey Fradel. Great mech. My favorite parts are the 'beefyness' of it, weapons and censors. The design certainly fits what you were going for and I also think it can be used as a training mech. BTW, I checked out the rest of your mechs and (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
| |
| | GPLR Clubhouse Installation Progress
|
|
It's been well over a month since we were given the keys to our new clubhouse at Cedar Hills Crossing, in Beaverton and we have a lot of work to do yet! The installation process will be a continual one, as this is a 'working' exhibit. Come see the (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: Track color
|
|
(...) I bought some that were marked "World City" then, and they were old grey. The box is marked "(C) 1991, 2003". Jason R (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Project Why? Because I wanna ask!
|
|
(...) I've gone and switched to a news reader cause of the inability to post my email. Works fine via NNTP :) -Rob A> (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Track color
|
|
(...) This was definitely true for the boxed cross tracks just before Christmas. They only had the others in "System" so I couldn't check. (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Track color
|
|
(...) This has been my experience as well in NYC/NJ area stores. Some of which were out of straight track after Xmas and have since been re-stocked. Re-stocked with old gray. Jonathan (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Track color
|
|
(...) Hi Dean! Are you sure about this (world city track boxes containing blay track?!) or have you just checked the old ones, which were filled with system grey? I never have heared about any blay track outside the potter trains - till today. And (...) (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Track color
|
|
(...) From LL Windsor, the Old grey ones were labelled as "System" with the old style, and the new grey were in "World City" boxes. (20 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.color)
|
