|
|
 | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) I read Steve's email as saying that they shouldn't and that the extension doesn't matter but IMO it does. Rereading it, it sounds like the extension does matter but that it shouldn't be used to identify the type of file which I agree with. /me (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) I don't think L3P pays any attention to parts.lst. To be honest, I don't think that it should. It's not an editor that's expected to give you a list of parts available for use. (And to be honest, I think that parts.lst is a generally bad idea, (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) The point is that it is not MLCad which differentiates, it is mklist. Tim (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) But that DOES differentiate between .dat and .ldr by the very fact it has the extension in parts.lst. If it didn't, 3010.dat and 3010.ldr would be interchangeable everywhere. This means that 3010.dat is NOT the same as 3010.ldr but L3P appears (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) No, it doesn't. (...) MLCad has no such restriction - that restriction is put in place by mklist. Go ahead - create parts/3010.LDR, edit parts.lst, add 3010.LDR and a description, it will magically appear in MLCad and be usable just as any (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Actually, there's really no easy way to do part detection, but filenames really aren't a good idea. I'm pretty sure Lars is fully aware of the part detection problem (since it also affects the seams option in L3P), and there have been (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Scorpion
|
| Eric Sophie schrieb: (...) It is now on the parts tracker. mikeheide (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) Surely the very fact it is .ldr instead of .dat differentiates it from the lego parts. MLCad doesn't recognise 3010.ldr as a valid part, and it allows both blah.dat and blah.ldr in the same mpd file. (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | | | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
| (...) Nice to see them (URL) using a CC2800>, although it is a bit scary being able to identify a crane from such a distance... ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, FTX)
| | | | | Re: L3P-Bug using LGEO
|
| (...) I agree with that - it's much easier for the user to eliminate such conflicts (eg call the set file set-926.ldr) than expect the software to make such decisions for you. ROSCO (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.cad.dev, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Advice needed on antique LEGO bricks
|
| (...) Aaron, That is a very good question. The secondary market is good for old Lego specialty items such as old road signs, beams with names, trees/bushes, Esso/Shell Station accessories, etc. But, there is little secondary market for other old (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: Big Brother?
|
| (...) Lego don't make a 7x2, it's obviously a clone. That would also explain it being an incompatible size. :-) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
| (...) Yes, very cool indeed... and there are some great construction pics here, if you are interested... (URL) "Red Brick" (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.events.brickfest)
| | | | | Re: 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
| (...) Janey, thanks for posting these pics. This project is really sofa-king coool. Like I said in a previous post, I didn't really understand how big it was until I flew over it a few months back on a trip to Winnipeg. Cheers, Ralph (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.events.brickfest)
| | | | | 3 Events worth of Photos...
|
| Yesterday I managed to sort thru a few hundred photos.... and put some of the recent (or not so recent) Lego Events I have attended up on Brickshelf. CanBricks - Hobby Show @ International Centre - Toronto Ontario - November 2005 Jason makes a (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.loc.ca.on, lugnet.org.ca.parlugment, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Big Brother?
|
| (...) Allan, I have some bad news. The guys at MIT did a study on TIN FOIL helmets, if you are using one; you HAVE to stop. (URL) is a snippet of results: (posted without permission (1)) --snip--- We investigate the efficacy of three aluminum helmet (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| | | | | Re: latest results
|
| (...) Steve, did you use my "skip over" light array idea? you didnt... I can feel it. Chris. PS any interest in a 8417 (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | latest results
|
| Well, the "guys from Indiana" did pretty good at the Chibots event last weekend. In addition to setting up a somewhat small (by our standards) ball contraption with 13 modules, we made a good showing with our competition robots. We (Brian, Bryan and (...) (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: After Eight
|
| Hey Jojo, More great furnishings! (Though I do not know the commercial) After all the great stuff (URL) in this folder>, you'd better be planning an entry for the "Castle room interior" category in CCCIII. Bruce (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Turners Cross a segment of a Castle
|
| Hey Nathan, Amazing MOC! I've left extensive comments on Classic-Castle. Bruce (20 years ago, 14-Nov-05, to lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
|
