 | | Carefree Party Liner (with wings)
|
|
First things first. This is NOT a Bonktron model. It's from a sister faction, the Sanitrons. The Carefree Party Liner plys the spaceways in a state of perpetual celebration. Individual partygoers come and go via the many docking ports in the wing, (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.announce.moc, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: New Ship: Harlequin
|
|
(...) Hey, can we leave the Bonktron comments to the items that specifically state they are Bonktron creations? (me, personally, doesn't find much merit or taste in the Bonktron stuff, but that's me). Kevoh, Good luck in college--you're in a great (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | LEGOFan.org frustrates me
|
|
LEGOFan.org frustrates me for three reasons. 1. LEGOFan.org is supposed to be the place were people from LEGO answer our questions about LDD (I'd even accept "Sorry, but I can't comment on that right now), but people from LEGO aren't answering or (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Galaxy Defender - classic space MOC
|
|
Indeed! A very cool MOC. Reminds me of a Snowspeeder and the Earth fighters from Buck Rogers in the 25th Century. Uber-cheesy show, but very snazzy ship designs. Dave S. (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | The Better Tosser
|
|
For my next GBC Module (Find out more about the GBC at www.teamhassenplug.org) I have been wotking on a ball tosser. I have come up with a design that shoots into a Hailfire Droid wheel 'funnel' put five feet away. (pics coming soon) I am wondering (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: direct manipulation of bits in RCX registers using NQC
|
|
Hey, Thanks for all the helpful responses, everyone. Brian: (...) I guess that "firmware" must be the code that tells RCX how to interpret user instructions (NQC, C, IC, opcodes, or whatever), and convert them to binary machine-specific code. Right? (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) Back to my childhood: They are bumps. One bumper, two bumper, four bumper (I never had any three bumpers when I named them) are 1x bricks. (...) One bumper center plate! (plates with no bumps are smooth plates.) (...) Headlight bricks. But the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Galaxy Defender - classic space MOC
|
|
(...) Good gravy, that's gorgeous! I'm glad you resurrected this thread. I can't believe I missed this the first time around. Hm... perhaps if we resurrect enough old threads we could drown out the noise that has made this forum so lame in the last (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I *think* that "knobs" may be more common in the U.K. but I could be very wrong. It would be interesting to hear from someone who uses the term (if anyone) and know where they are. I know at least one reference to it, and it was one made by (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) And from my perspective, if I heard the word 'lug' I would think of a 'lug nut' and studs don't really remind me of those. But it's interesting to hear that someone does, indeed, use a term like that. This is what makes this topic so much fun. (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
(...) I found those elements to be difficult to label. I'm not sure 'bevel' is perfect, but then neither is wedge. ;) Had I known about 'skew' I just might have tried to resurrect that term. I quite like it. (...) I think slope bricks are actually (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Torsen Differential
|
|
(...) some traction with 1 wheel off the ground. A wheel only "locks" when it loses traction, when both wheels have traction it works like a standard differential. There is a small explanation here: (URL) I don't seem to be able to view that pic - (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Trains is the tidiest
|
|
I'd like to nominate trains for the tidiest and up-to-date-ist sidebar on Lugner. Thanks Tim for doing such a good job. It's the only group I come to directly (as opposed to from the recent activity page) as I know the sidebar is so useful. Thanks! (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Torsen Differential
|
|
What exactly is the advantage of a Torsen differential design? Does it eliminate slip, or is it just a more solid design? (URL) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) I found a similar problem a while back, lsynth seemed to treat those hoses "not as bendy" as they actually are. I emailed kevin and he sent me an update that fixed the problem, I'm not sure if it has been released publically yet, but I'm sure (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lsynth and control points
|
|
(...) Are you sure you have your constraints in order from beginning of host to end of hose? (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Today's offer from JJ's Furniture Store: A cupboard
|
|
(...) Very well done, this is one of those brilliant little creations that shows how impressive a small MOC can be. Will you be building more pieces of furniture in the same style? Derek (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
|
I think a few of us have our own terms. I have heard the studs referred to as "lugs" as well, although I did have to explain to someone that it was not reason Lugnet is so named. How about Technic Beams vs Technic Bricks. I admit to never having (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: GBC Train crossing
|
|
(...) Even better, make the transfer sensors and waiting points as far away as possible while still preserving train-non-crashingness. That way we could run it so the two trains are often (always?) headed for the crossing at the same time, but never (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
| |
| | GBC Train crossing
|
|
Well, when I started to type this e-mail, I had a question, but I think I've already answered it. I was thinking about our GBC trains. If we don't want to run them on the same loop, maybe we could run them on separate loops that cross over each (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
