 | | PbForth compatibility
|
|
Hi, Does PbForth run on RCX 1.0 and RCS 1.5? (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.pbforth)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
|
(...) Too bad they aren't available via Shop At Home, unless I've missed seeing them there? I've never been to an official company store or LLCA, so I guess I've never been exposed to these. Hey, now I don't feel like it was such a silly idea after (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) And my point remains the same - if someone posts a message titled "Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs!" to lugnet.trains, and I happen to be browsing lugnet.trains, I am going to assume that the letter is (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Train Moc - Simple Red Caboose
|
|
Have to say the caboose looks really good, I'd almost go so far as to say its the definative model. However I realise that cabooses vary! It seems like you have distilled all the good elements of previous caboose MOCs into one. Interested to see (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for discussion!
|
|
(...) This letter I fully support. -- Tony Hafner www.hafhead.com (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Open letter to the CEO of the LEGO Company / Call for your signs! (no discussions here please)
|
|
(...) I'm sorry, I didn't realize that by posting on lugnet, I was pointing a finger in anyone's face. Please forgive my ignorance! Perhaps that explains all the foul language and ill will coming from the anti-bringbackoldcolors camp. I promise that (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Loader Building Instruction Available !!!
|
|
(...) design and the preparation of the instructions. Spotlighted! Best regards, Allan B. (URL) The LEGO Builder's Guide> (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
|
(...) This already exists - there's a yellow tub that is sold empty at LEGO stores and I believe at LLCA too. IIRC they were lampooned on LUGNET ("$X.XX for an empty tub? What are they, nuts?"). Personally I like the big tubs with the studs, just (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
|
(...) I think putting them all in consistent packaging (not tubs - see below for more) is a great idea. Now... getting stores to actually display them all together, so the effect (of similar packaging) can pay off, is another story. It amazes me to (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | BigBen Bricks! (Was: Parts editing made easy...?)
|
|
(...) Like, wow! Triple wow! Fisrt LCAD, and now LCAM! I wonder how expesive that could be! And I wonder if they are willing to make some custom size Classic style windows and not only train wheels! And I wish that LEGO would offer the same service, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) Thanks Kelly, One does not have to be college educated to be able to figure out if one has violated the ToS. I couldn't recite a single item from the ToS, because it has been so long since I read it. But I know the difference between crossing (...) (21 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: who does chris think he is?
|
|
(...) This sort of highlights something that I wonder about. Are smaller, out-of-the way groups more suitable for otherwise questionable behavior? With things like off-topic.debate, it's skipped by default, so there's less chance that (say) a kid (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: IR Tower Building
|
|
(...) Try this schematic, which is my interpretation of the RS232 IR tower supplied with the RCX: (URL) Apart from the IR receiver device itself, getting hold of suitable components shouldn't be difficult. Most of the transistors are general purpose (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
|
(...) Hi Stefan, yes I believe there would be interest in such a utility. And yes, I believe most people still used text-based programs to edit parts. There are tools that make it a bit easier, like LDDesignPad, but it's still basically just a text (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Wire routing
|
|
(...) In my wider trains I usually include a 1x4 hole in the cab floor and have the wire connecting to the motor with the connector at the same end of the motor as the coupling. The 1x4 slot gives enough room for the bogies of a loco of bogie (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Parts editing made easy, anyone?
|
|
Are parts authors really using text editors to compose new parts? I find it hard to understand that a text editor is still the tool of choice for this relatively complicated modeling task. I might be wrong and could need an update on what tools (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
|
(...) I'd rather pay less for the package and have more of my money go to the brick. The new tub with the studs is not really a very good tub compared to the old one with the flat lid... it takes up a lot more space and doesn't travel nearly as (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Studios Question
|
|
{snip} I called the number for Lego Canada and was told by a recording that they would be closed Oct.11 for Thanksgiving, and resume regular business hours afterwards. Not sure if I called the wrong number, or called after hours or what happened. (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
|
You know, I can understand not using tubs for the smaller sets, but it sure would have been nice to see the 4421 in a tub. Then again, continuity of the series might be lost if one were in a tub while others were in boxes... I know! Put them ALL in (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | RCX3 - Can extra hardware functionality be added?
|
|
Having had a good look inside my RCX, I'm thinking seriously about what is really possible in the same space envelope, whether extra ports or functions could be added for RCX3. I think it's useful for us to know what's inside the RCX, especially if (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
