 | | Re: Lessons learned in pre-school
|
|
(...) Snip Hi Chris, Thanks for sharing that. I really enjoyed hearing about the trials and tribulations of your day. Lots of "grownups" would have issues with just spending a large amount of time with that many "rug rats" never mind allowing them (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | A new favicon
|
|
Hey folks, You may have noticed rtlToronto's webpage has a new favourites icon. It was designed by Rob Antonishen! Calum (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Software installation problems
|
|
Hi all, I got recently a harddisc (C:\) problem and needed to replace all my programs. So i uploaded the latest Ldraw027.exe and Complete.exe Installed both as explained on LDRAW.ORG. No problems at all But i want to install following programs too: (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Lessons learned in pre-school
|
|
(...) Those sound like good ideas. they also sound like ideas that are out of my limited area of expertise. Chris (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Lessons learned in pre-school
|
|
(...) Yes, that is true, but the box indicates that LEGO isn't aiming the controler at the 4-year old crowd that I was entertaining. Since I often use the 'extra' power, I don't mind that the speed regulator will deliver it. None the less you are (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Lessons learned in pre-school
|
|
(...) I don't know why LEGO don't provide a voltage regulator. We pay a high price for the power unit and you can get a voltage regulator for a few pounds/dollars. At 9V the train goes too fast at full speed on a normal length of track and a normal (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Taun-Taun
|
|
(...) Awesome Bruce...Great job! Justin (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.starwars, FTX)
|
| |
| | RE: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
<SNIP> (...) There is only one layout, strictly using the current rules, that a self sustaining layout can be achieved: XXX...XXX X X XXX...XXX And, the balls would be traveling clockwise in the layout. Note, that given the current basic rules, (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) I didn't think about this until lunch, but you'll note this little yellow modules conforms to the spec, and works very well as an 90 degree turn to the left, and could also turn right: (URL) fact, it may be interesting to see someone build a (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) That's a good idea, which I don't think has been suggested, yet. However, that sort of requires a module to have corner studs... :) This module mostly uses liftarms: (URL) it turns out, I suspect 90% of the modules will not require (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction?
|
|
maybe this will be the set that brings me out of my dark year. i allready have something in the works... (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO new crane: a step in the right direction?
|
|
maybe this will be the set that brings me out of my dark year. steve (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: Differenze tra i Ris (1.0 1.5 2.0)
|
|
(...) Non vorrei dire una bestialità! Ho acquistato un RCX 1.0 un po' di tempo fa su e-bay... ma non ha la porta esterna! Che voi sappiate esistono versioni diverse per l'1.0 ? Ho acquistato un modello "ibrido" (tra l'altro funziona benissimo :-) ? (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
Steve Hassenplug writes: > (URL) notice that the spec says "Currently, there is no standard for physically connecting modules together." One possibility is for a module to grab onto the two corner studs of the input bin of the module to the right, (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Differenze tra i Ris (1.0 1.5 2.0)
|
|
Ciao Alessandro (...) Esatto. E anche aggiornabile col nuovo firmware di Dick Swan: www.drjsoftware.com (Vedi il thread "Nuovo firmware per RCX") (...) In dotazione c'è solo la torre IR con collegamento seriale. Se vuoi puoi acquistare a parte una (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.org.it.itlug)
|
| |
| | Re: trading
|
|
(...) That would be better suited to market.theory than .general, at least in my opinion. (...) I find trades to be a fair bit of work and I find myself doing them less and less. The advent of automation at sites to aid buying and selling tilts it (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) Why impose more limits than necessary? Of the 10 modules in our (very successful) test GBC, these 4 would have to be eliminated for being out-of-spec: (not a multiple of 32) (URL) I forgot, you can't use 48x48 baseplates. Add this: (URL) to (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
(...) Wow. Mondayness for me as well. I agree with you, Rob. That said, to start, Steve and Co. have their little thing goin' on, and I just wanted to point out that, within the parameters as layed out by them, one has toe potential to make a module (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: trading
|
|
(...) This was not for trading, but rarther the discussion of trades or not. Therefore I see, that it can be here as "general discussion". So: great to hear that you like them too! S (21 years ago, 9-Jan-05, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
| |
| | Re: The Great Ball Contraption
|
|
"David Koudys" <dkoudys@redeemer.on.ca> wrote in message news:IA3zL9.xKJ@lugnet.com... (...) What's the big deal? Either you can make a module to comply with simple specs, or you can't. If you need more space and can't fit everything inside 1 - (...) (21 years ago, 10-Jan-05, to lugnet.robotics)
|
