 | | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) Gary, the problem is that from Jake's mouth: Quote: I do know, however, that there will be 5 set limit per customer on this set (Troy,are you listening? J). Why you ask? This set uses …drum roll please… Maersk blue! In fact, the run of this (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) MAJOR SNIPAGE (...) The problem doesn't lie within the community it lies within the company. Proof of this is that they are dumbfounded as to why with all of their efforts they are still loosing money. I missed The whole Marsk debate but let's (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
|
(...) For your amusement: (URL) #203 (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) Olof, I wouldn't expect there to be too much problem in this regard. It would be different if they were trying to re-create an old colour that hadn't been used in many years, and there had since been changes in ABS formulation, suppliers, part (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) To clarify: "collectibility", by your explanations, is based purely on your own *speculation* (and others who share your thinking). TLC's "assertion" (as you call it) had nothing whatsoever to do with making the set "collectible", since, as (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) John, I really don't understand this point. I mean that literally, I don't understand. You may very well be right within this odd-sounding (to me) corner of the collector world. But personally, I fail to see how a simple set (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: new moc: holly berry wreath
|
|
(...) C'est magnifique. I'm jealous of your foliage parts. A Lego wreath is much better than a questionably-smelling real one. Being a sucker for pretty, ridiculouly fragile things as I am, I just can't get enough of this. Happy Holidays, Kevin (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.build, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) All this attitude does is tell Lego that when they make a cool set for a corporate client, they are better off not offering it to the general public. Luckily for the sane amongst us, the public in general doesn't have this attitude. So the (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Mac MPD Utility 1.2 released
|
|
(...) Oh, why not. Could you list it with the same address alias as in the about box (anoved@binghamton.edu)? That would keep it consistent. (...) Cool. I need to reinstall/relearn the l3p/pov-ray stuff - it definitely makes for prettier output than (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.mac)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) Good Night Everybody! Derek (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) That's what I call mine too. Iain (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) Amen, And thank you William, Another voice of reason. Let the collectors cry all they want. As I said, Kudos to TLC for taking Mearsk's money and making a profit. Oh, the collectors don't want that happening. WELL TO DAMN BAD. Steven Weiser (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: One last Spring Cleaning set
|
|
(...) Is that what you get when you cross Tuesday and Thursday? (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) Are you trying to say LUGNET has "jumped the shark"? That's a serious question, please answer seriously... if you are, you may not be the only person thinking that, not by a wide margin. (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: My average set
|
|
I guess I'll get caught up in this Mathematical craziness, too, since I happen to be a Maths graduate. My average (mean) set: [LEGOSet 6007] Modal set: [LEGOSet 3219] Median set: [LEGOSet 6523] Some notes: I actually do own my mean set, but not my (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
|
| |
| | Using Firefox on Shop at Home website
|
|
Hi all, Those of you who may have switched to using the recently released Firefox 1.0 as your browser may also have encountered a problem with the Shop at Home website that it doesn't allow you to switch destination countries, saying you must have (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
In lugnet.lego, Johannes Koehler wrote: ... While on the other (...) I applaud any effort by TLC to spoil the efforts of speculators to profit from the scarcity of a set. I wish they would rerelease monorail, Classic Space, and a bunch of other (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Whatever happened...
|
|
(...) you know who ~I~ blame!!! Margret Thatcher! everything is mostly HER fault! Chris oh look down there... a shark (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: 10152 Update
|
|
(...) I think it's incredible that LEGO gives any attention to AFOL's at all. Now you want them to give special attention to the minority who are collectors? You don't ask much, do you? It's great that LEGO has made this set available again. And (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: trading
|
|
(...) (snip) It is generally accepted that posts seeking to trade are off-topic for lugnet.general or for most theme groups, but rather should be posted somewhere in the market hierarchy. lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade is often a good choice for (...) (21 years ago, 21-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
