 | | Re: N-Fedge primitives
|
|
(...) I missed responding to this one specific point. In general, aliases amongst the primitives would be a bad thing. They would primarily add more files to an already too-large list of primitives, and would only provide duplicate function. In this (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives, FTX)
|
| |
| | Set 8652 Render
|
|
I recently modelled set 8642. I still need to do some file clean up so I'm not quite ready to release the DAT file but look for it on my website ((URL) in the coming weeks. Here's the render I did as a teaser: (URL) that the trans-smoke parts aren't (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Daniel Siskind wrote: <snip> (...) See, much nicer with the wording. Maybe it is me, but I liked how you presented yourself in this posting much more than the other one. Dave K -can't we all just... get along... ;) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
|
(...) Oops. Thanks for the correct link, John. (...) debugging the existing ones. That said, version 2.5.4 is excellent. The event bugs have been fixed as well as a ton of others. Also, more (not all) of the underlying code is unlocked. This allows (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Town Hall - Micro Scale for Lego Factory Contest
|
|
Here, here, I was wondering what happened there and am glad it came out the way it did. My designs ended up in fifth and sixth place (waterfall scene with train and hospital). Pretty awesome considering those were some of my first ones. It seems (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.microscale)
|
| |
| | Lego Factory repeat entries???
|
|
Hi all, I wonder if anybody else has noticed that some entries are showing up more than once. For example, the Dutch windmill which is currently in second place for the junior contest (week 4) is also entered as a model for week 5. However, the (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.microscale)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
In lugnet.market.shopping, Daniel Siskind wrote: <snip> (...) Eh, I've been off-base before, but that's the way the message presented itself to me. You've stated that you've had various negative dealings with TLC--my dealings with them have been (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
|
(...) Sounds great. But I run the nqc compiler on Linux and have no COM... (...) Sometimes I dream of a BricxCC written in Java, running on Win, Linux or OSX with Control Lab and all kind of features... something like an Bricklipse... (...) Well... (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) I guess thanks are in order to you Jake for looking in on this for me. I was not looking for any kind of special intervention to resolve this issue, which is why I didn't use any of my "pull" with employees I know in the first place. My point (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) Not to add fuel to the fire, but coming from a person who has actually benefitted financially from TLG, this has got to be pretty serious... -Bryan (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: New England Church - MOC for Lego Factory week 4
|
|
(...) Thank you! Yea, I really am enjoying the challenge of using the limited pallate. Some people are making cool details that I never would have thought of! Anyway, you can see lots of cool designs on (URL) . -Alfred (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Confirmation
|
|
(...) Hi, they match exactly without any gap. Bye Ronald (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) You are way off the mark here. I love the building system, have been playing with it for over 20 years. Yet I find it impossible to give any more money to a company has little regard for its cutomers other than making a profit from them and (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Halving the colours in the palette - Lego Life Sept 2004
|
|
(...) OK, I figured it was worth asking. :) Steve (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.color)
|
| |
| | Re: Shop@Home Nightmare! (from a now ex-AFOL)
|
|
(...) I seriously doubt that you'd get a "Jake who?" from anyone but the rollover call center. I worked and lived in Enfield for two years and have traveled back and forth there regularly for a year before and a year after. I've worked with and (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.dear-lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
|
(...) Not true RoboLab supports the Scout, microscout and Interface B. (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Part Confirmation
|
|
Can anyone confirm if part 30165 "'Brick 2 x 2 with Curved Top and 2 Studs on Top" fits into part 3659 "Arch 1 x 4"? Specifically, can I put them together like (URL) without a huge gap? -Rob (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.build.microscale, lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | New Designer sets & RC parts appearing on S@H
|
|
I noticed these new items have appeard on Lego™ S@H. Some of them do not have pictures yet. 7244 Speedboat (no pictures, except for the "zoom" feature works). 4881 Robo Platoon (no pics) 4882 Speed Wings (no pics) The following items appear to be (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: TR: North America's First/Only DeLaval VMS
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Iain Hendry wrote: Hi Iain, snipped intro. (...) After reading this, and being fairly familiar with the automated milking process, a few questions of this robotic process popped into my head..... and I was wondering if (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
|
(...) Here's a link to the "Robolab for LavVIEW" that Tom was talking about: (URL) is a ~50 MB download. This is version 2.5.2. You can download the patch (4 MB) to 2.5.3 here: (URL) tufts.edu site says that "Robolab for LabVIEW" has only been (...) (21 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
