To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.roboticsOpen lugnet.robotics in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Robotics / 23134
23133  |  23135
Subject: 
Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.robotics
Date: 
Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:14:37 GMT
Viewed: 
3169 times
  
John Hansen wrote:

> It is conceivable that a Control Lab target could be added to NQC which would
> let you compile an NQC program into a JavaScript that would use a COM automation
> object to talk to the Control Lab.

Sounds great. But I run the nqc compiler on Linux and have no COM...

> Alternatively, an IDE like BricxCC could be modified to have a separate Control Lab feature of some sort.

Sometimes I dream of a BricxCC written in Java, running on Win, Linux or OSX
with Control Lab and all kind of features... something like an Bricklipse...

>  I'm not sure how many people are interested in such a thing.

Well... <sigh>

Regards,

Michael



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
 
(...) Here's a link to the "Robolab for LavVIEW" that Tom was talking about: (URL) is a ~50 MB download. This is version 2.5.2. You can download the patch (4 MB) to 2.5.3 here: (URL) tufts.edu site says that "Robolab for LabVIEW" has only been (...) (22 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)

12 Messages in This Thread:





Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR