Subject:
|
Why NQC over Robolab?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Mon, 6 Dec 2004 22:43:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
992 times
|
| |
| |
Greetings All,
I'm hoping that someone who is familiar with both NQC and Robolab can enlighten
me. Specifically, with regard to the RCX, Scout, and microScout, what can you
do in NQC that you cannot do in Robolab? Is it simply a matter of programming
environment preference or does NQC have some real advantages?
Thanks Much,
Tom
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
| (...) I'm not very familiar with Robolab so I can't give you a direct comparison between the two. But I can say a few things about NQC that might help. With NQC you write programs in a more traditional style of programming (ala C, C++, C#, Java, (...) (20 years ago, 7-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| | | Re: Why NQC over Robolab?
|
| Hi, (...) Actually, I've only played with the Robolab demo version. First, Robolab is for working with the RCX. I saw no Scout or microscout support. The target of Robolab is the use in education, for example at schools. Robolab is related to (...) (20 years ago, 8-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
12 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|