 | | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) Is this true? I've been out of the "official update" loop for a while, but when I suggested this method a year or so ago it was rejected due to "sub-part clutter" and the fears of an unreasonable burden upon parts-authors. Has this changed (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: cylinders missing conditional lines?
|
|
(...) Actually, if you use conditional lines that follow the red tangent lines, as in Travis' diagram, then you want them to overlap. You get partial coverage from each of them that adds up to the total coverage you'd get from the original style of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: Most stunning motorbike ever?!?
|
|
Hey do you guys think this might have been a preview of a real set? It at least looks like it could be. I wonder why it was removed. I really wanted to show it to someone. Speculation? Thoughts? That would be one heck of a set. I'd buy it in a snap. (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: three mountainbikes
|
|
(...) I really like these, Lars. Perhaps the black bike needs the front forks at a greater angle to increase the wheelbase? Otherwise, it's close, but too square as you mentioned. Still a great model, though. Thanks for sharing, Ed (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) So I understand that studlogos may face any direction as long as they are not mirrored? How about a mix of rotated studlogos on one single part instead of all studslogos facing the same direction? E.g. some studlogos readable when the part is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: cylinders missing conditional lines?
|
|
(...) I checked a few official parts that use the 2-4cyli primitive. And all the parts I have checked so far are missing the conditional line at one end of the cylinder. So I suspect that part authors expect that all partial cylinder primitives have (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: S@H Exchange Rate?!?! (was Re: BNSF high balls it!)
|
|
(...) Hey, forget about complaining about too high prices outside the US to S@H. Lego ist totally deaf on that ear. Besides, $CDN59.99 is about US$49.79, which is still cheaper than our EUR39.99, which in turn is about US$51.19. And the stuff is (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: BNSF high balls it!
|
|
(...) That's because they have to fit bigger snowploughs on the front to get through. ;) Jason Railton (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | Re: I want to become a reviewer
|
|
(...) Yes - these kind of errors are not a cause for a hold. I'm with Orion on stud rotation, but I'd prefer not to have parts/subparts designed in a way that causes mirrored studs. We have set a precedent with car doors, by moving the stud from the (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
| |
| | FS: Lego Mindstorms 1.5 robotics kit
|
|
Hi! I have a Lego Mindstorm 1.5 kit for sale. It comes complete with all the sensors, motors, the brick and programming towers, all manuals (and the optical path "map"), wheels, software CD, serial cable, etc... However, I cannot guarantee 100% that (...) (21 years ago, 4-Nov-04, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
|
