 | | Re: Why is it pushed back? Was:Burlington is being shipped (in Europe, that is)
|
|
(...) that is exact.. here in europe, for the BNSF, the initial ship date was 11/09/04 and it has finally been shiped 10/24/04. Didier Enjary (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Walmart has Mars Rovers again ($30)
|
|
Dropped by my loal Walmart yesterday, and they have about 60 copies of 7471 Mars Exploration Rover priced at $29.86. They were mostly on a pallet in the aisle, and on an endcap next to the megabloks. Only a couple were in with the LEGO. Still $5 (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.loc.ca)
|
| |
| | History of 4679
|
|
This is probably a question for Jake, but there may be other sources of info. How did 4679 come to be? With its odd but very useful collection of additional bits, you have to buy quite a few just to make sure you get some of the different versions. (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.dear-lego) !
|
| |
| | Re: Problem creating .pov using LGEO parts in L3PAdd-on
|
|
(...) Hi Tim, I have everything running on my E drive, so it is possible. :-) Here's my thought... There should be an LDRAW.INI file in your Windows directory. Make sure you have the "LgeoDirectory" entry set correctly under the "[LDRAW]" section, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.ray)
|
| |
| | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
|
(...) What if we said that a 'bot could enter if it could only scan the Connect 4 board, or drop a chip anywhere and still be counted (though, so I'm told, that's what some of them did) The event is block stacking. We've done it 3 times before. If (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGlite and LPub
|
|
(...) I assume that L3P allows the output to be any aspect ratio. The page is a little confusing that way. However, it's trying to tell you how the camera angle argument works, going on the assumption you haven't changed the aspect ratio. Just (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is it pushed back? Was:Burlington is being shipped (in Europe, that is)
|
|
(...) Simple: This isn't an exact science. We estimate our best guess and work hard to get things in place by those dates in order to get you goods as quickly as possible. Overall, our track record is that we typically ship on or often before the (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Piggybacking sensors, but in a different way
|
|
Is it possible to piggyback 1 sensor onto two rcx's? For instance, have one light sensor connected to port 1 of two different rcx's at the same time. The purpose would be for one rcx to control chassis movement, and another to control manipulator (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts
|
|
(...) Why do high-res primitives make it easier to realize? Considering the size of this object, I'd lean toward needing to reduce it. Steve (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is there an official "membership" for SciBrick?
|
|
(...) Sure. Keep in mind we don't have to use your suggestions ;) - but I'm always open to hearing people's ideas. What sort of suggestions did you have in mind? It might be more appropriate to email me about them (Comm.Officer@scibrick.org) than to (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
| |
| | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
|
(...) I didn't get to see it either. I think we were too busy running our C$ robots in the final... But, I believe it moved all the marbles onto the opponent's square, because the penalty for "wrong" marbles was bigger than the points for "right" (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Why is it pushed back? Was:Burlington is being shipped (in Europe, that is)
|
|
Why does the release date keep getting pushed back in the US? When I pre-ordered mine, the shipping date was November 11, 2004. Then it got pushed back to November 24th. Now it says it will ship by december 8th! What going on? -Juan (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Can I "Belt" You?
|
|
Here's something new for you customizers out there - (URL) Jeff (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.build.minifigs)
|
| |
| | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Steve Hassenplug wrote: <snip> (...) Wow. That is lotsa good stuff, but great googly moogly! This whole thing started 'cause I asked to run a 'mini block stacking' competition. We went from a 'lets build a nifty block (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
And here is the primitive: CU Bernd 0 Click Rotation Socket Cogwheel Quarter 0 Name: 1-4crs.dat 0 Author: Bernd Broich 0 Unofficial Primitive 0 BFC CERTIFY CW 0 Inner Ring R = 11 LDU 0 Outer Ring R = 12 LDU 0 Upper Ring 2 24 0 0 11.2 0.5 0 11.35 2 (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Click-Rotation Parts [DAT]
|
|
(...) Sorry but there is no finished part yet. (...) I could send you a nearly finished part (48169) where the bottom is open. But else it's finished. To Steve Bliss or Chris Dee: I've made the cylinder-thing with high-res- primitives because it was (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Can we help?
|
|
(...) Now this may sound naive, but: WHY do you (and so many with you) object to production in China? I have seen some very good quality coming from over there (Atlas model trains comes to mind). I realy don't know why China would be a worse place (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Paranoie & perversioni...pazzie e pazzi
|
|
(...) *Non* ho fatto. Odio le etichette perchè sono appiccicose... :-) Tutte le mie cassettiere sono trasparenti, si riesce a vedere il contenuto dall'esterno. Inoltre, essendo malato di Ottolinite, sono in grado di trovare la locazione di un pezzo (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: Compound shaft
|
|
(...) I've seen this done a) with a new style differential - it will spin free on a central axle and has a 24t gear at one end and a 16t at the other. b) two 16t "clutch" gears connected either via the toothed bearings, or via the driving ring (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Onwards to rtlToronto18...
|
|
(...) Ok, I can't remember, what did this robot do that was considered a loop hole in the rules? (...) True it does allow for a pure sorting robot. Maybe we don't want to allow that. I thought it allowed for a good entry level robot. But it could (...) (22 years ago, 26-Oct-04, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
