 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) So you're agreeing, then? Nothing here was censored, which is confirmed by the very definitions you quote. Do be clearer in future, hmm? (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Where Brooklyn at? (Was: racial politics, black pack, etc.)
|
|
(...) Except the first movie, where finding a non-european face is almost impossible. I think this happened in part because it was shot (mostly) in England, but Lucas was roundly criticized for it. Bruce (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) That's precisely what I'm doing. As long as he's convinced that what he's doing isn't editorial control he's never going to seek legal advice about it, is he? (...) ++Lar (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Builder's Block (no pun intended....)
|
|
Can someone please give me an insanely complecated project to undertake? I seem to be out of ideas at the moment. Thanks. Also, does anyone know when the Pneumatics Pack and the Power Puller will be available in the US? (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
(...) :) (...) Yeah, but wouldn't the Escape Pod be a pretty small set, say around $5.99? That would probably mean it'd include a maximum of 2 characters, & wouldn't they most likely be R2-D2 & C3-P0? (...) Yeah, if we're assuming an Imperial year (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I think that's too simple a dismissal. See my previous post about isolated facts and how they can add up to Really Big Secrets. "this fact by itself doesn't tell you much" is not a valid defense in and of itself. Besides, unless we're in the (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Pricing on Lego Sets
|
|
(...) I think what you mean here is that until The LEGO Group redefines "play value" to what you want it to mean, or what you think it means, they have not recognized the importance of play value. But play value is all TLG talks about. Read their (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) I am not sure if anyone major could change there production runs now. I suppose knowlege at the lower end of the food chain is much more powerful: If I were a toy shop and I knew TLC had an impressive range on the way - I may not buy (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Nuove strade
|
|
(...) :-(((...((( Allora mi tengo le strade con le striscie bianche e verdi :-)) Ciao Ernesto P:S grazie per l'informazione (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
(...) they (...) Unless it comes with the imperial search squad that finds it in the desert? :-) Scott A (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Started 8479 Code Pilot Truck....
|
|
(...) like. (...) Well, I agree and disagree. I don't think Advanced Builder should necessarily indicate someone who can read instructions well. Even in the 8448, there were times when the added parts were VERY difficult to find, either because they (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) No, I'm not implying that. I believe that it's possible that some things related to this might possibly potentially violate some privacy law somewhere, and I believe that it's potentially likely that some things related to this may be (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:Fz1A7r.MI3@lugnet.com... (...) not (...) Very true - imagine this scenario - You want a particular mini-figure, "Timmy", that is only available in a very large, very expensive set this year. (1) (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) Nope. Nothing here was censored, which is confirmed by the (...) Really? (...) A thread? (...) Secret - TLG would say so, or at least that is what I am told :-) Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New Catalogue
|
|
(...) Cool, I'm in Central London this w/end - I may be able to pick one up :) (But they've put the lego department on the top floor! It takes _ages_ to get up there now, and my anticipation rises with every escalator... Steve (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Sets
|
|
Well, Since we are supposing the hypothetical escape pod set might only cost under US$6, this may not make sense. Anyway, it would be cool: How about if the escape pod did come with an imperial search squad. There could be a stormtrooper on a (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) A quick tangent: I didn't hear TLC request that anyone cease and desist from discussing this information or anything else. To the best of my knowledge, the sole request was expungement of preexisting posts containing TLC-sensitive information. (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) You, he and I can call it what we want. Actions speak louder than words. Scott A (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Thanks for dialing Ask-a-Judge
|
|
Hi everyone. I've decided to post this email, with the owner's name excluded for their own privacy. I thought it would be good to post, because perhaps some of you have similar opinions... perhaps not. Personally, I thought this was a perfect (...) (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.space)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
|
(...) That's great. But it should have been sent to the poster, not you. Or, understanding the desire for a quick response, sent to both. (26 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
