|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
> [...]
> hurtful to Lego about fans discussing these upcoming sets, which does
> nothing but generate publicity, that it is worth it to TLC to actually
> request that we cease and desist discussing it, thereby creating bad vibes
> between Lego and their fan community?
A quick tangent:
I didn't hear TLC request that anyone cease and desist from discussing this
information or anything else. To the best of my knowledge, the sole request
was expungement of preexisting posts containing TLC-sensitive information.
You can be sure on gut instinct of course that TLC would rather that people
not discuss the information, but I'm almost positive that no edict has been
issued. Maybe you weren't implying that they had, but it kinda sounded that
way and I just want to make sure the record is straight.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I'm just a little confused, I guess. A list of (possible) upcoming set names, set numbers, and prices was posted. TLC asked you to remove them. Are you really saying that if I went over to lugnet.space and said "well, I wonder what set number (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Even if they have directed it at Target- and all their other retailers- it's ridiculous for them to try and stick the cat back in the bag. What possible purpose does it serve? Why does it benefit them to have people on Lugnet not talk about (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.general)
|
176 Messages in This Thread: (Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|