| |
In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
> I realise that your best answer for this is the first thing you said here-
> that you aren't a lawyer- but are you really implying that discussing this
> information- in any way, in any forum- violates the law or infinges on TLC's
> rights?
No, I'm not implying that. I believe that it's possible that some things
related to this might possibly potentially violate some privacy law somewhere,
and I believe that it's potentially likely that some things related to this
may be construed by TLC as infringement, but unfortunately, I think only TLC
is in the position to know for sure whether a given thing infringes upon their
privacy rights or not -- which makes it very difficult for us to judge how far
we can go. I don't know about "cat's outta the bag" laws. I don't know what
the wording was in their contract with Target or other trade partners and of
course I wouldn't know how to interpret it decisively anyway.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Gotta disagree with that one. If it were companies (or individuals, for that matter) who got to decide what their own rights were, we'd all be in trouble. What if they said that "All four-digit numbers are trade secrets. Don't use them."? Of (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) Todd: I realise that your best answer for this is the first thing you said here- that you aren't a lawyer- but are you really implying that discussing this information- in any way, in any forum- violates the law or infinges on TLC's rights? I (...) (24 years ago, 9-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.admin.terms)
|
176 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
