Subject:
|
Re: Motorized microscale train
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:28:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2173 times
|
| |
|
|
Using thread instead of chain links is indeed a cheaper solution, and may even
give more curving options. The only problem I’d see is propulsion, thread
doesn’t have as much ’ grip’ as chain links have.
| |
BTW how did you attach the magnets to the chain links in the first place?
|
 +
The wide chain link fits snugly inside the technic hole of the magnet holder.
As can also be seen here , which is
incidentally also the set where I got my 4 ‘wide variety’ chain links.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Motorized microscale train
|
| In lugnet.announce.moc, Peer Kreuger wrote: Wow, that's all very well done! The space baseplate, the magnets, the detailing on the train itself, et al! And easy expansion for a large layout. And hey... if you use one of the contoured baseplates, you (...) (19 years ago, 20-Sep-05, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
