Subject:
|
Re: Deciding on a large ship acronym
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.space
|
Date:
|
Thu, 31 Oct 2002 03:50:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
828 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.space, Jon Palmer writes:
> Granted some builders will make (and have
> in the past) some ships that are this long/wide/tall yet extremely weeny.
> Maybe we could even make another acronym for ships that are trying to hard
> to be a SHIP. For some reason I keep thinking BLIP...can't really think of
> what it stands for though..
BLIP=By Lucifer, It's Puny
--
Tony Hafner
www.hafhead.com
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Deciding on a large ship acronym
|
| (...) Normally I wouldn't waste people's time with a "LOL Post", but I've been unable to formulate any sensible replies to other threads on Lugnet because for the past fifteen minutes or so I keep cracking up at Tony's acronym. :) -Hendo, Man Who (...) (22 years ago, 31-Oct-02, to lugnet.space)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Deciding on a large ship acronym
|
| "Hendo (John P. Henderson)" <hendo@valyance.com> wrote in message news:H4tIKw.F1A@lugnet.com... (...) I try. I try. (...) or (...) might (...) Great questions. I personally think anything that is either 100+ long/wide/tall would be included. Granted (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-02, to lugnet.space)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
