Subject:
|
Re: detecting goal objects at a distance
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics
|
Date:
|
Sat, 1 Jan 2000 21:26:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
758 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.robotics, Peter Vogel writes:
> Consider blocking the light emitter on the sensor, either completely or
> partially
> (the side of the emitter facing the sensor) to reduce the saturation of the
> sensor
> by the emitter,
I've read this tip several times. I experimented with it last night, and the
difference between blocking and not blocking the sensor was minimal. My light
sensor must not bleed much light directly across. Perhaps I'm doing something
wrong?
Re: directionality, I've found that a black 1x2 beam works well to localize the
sensor, and if you put a black connector peg in there it can look right past
bright light sources and see dark objects. This would probably work well in
conjunction with a laser pointer.
--Ben
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: detecting goal objects at a distance
|
| Ben Jackson <ben@ben.com> wrote in message news:FnJpCI.JGo@lugnet.com... (...) it (...) a (...) systematically) (...) darkened (...) barely (...) target in (...) on (...) make (...) Consider blocking the light emitter on the sensor, either (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
