 | | | | | |
Subject:
|
LUG & LTC dates of formation update
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.org.ca.viclug, lugnet.org.us.gmlug, lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.org.us.wafol, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.org.it.itlug, lugnet.org.us.dixielug, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.org.au, lugnet.org.us.cmlug, lugnet.org.us.nclug, lugnet.org.us.lugola, lugnet.org.ca.vlc, lugnet.org.us.sealug, lugnet.org.us.lugco, lugnet.org.us.gflug
|
Followup-To:
|
lugnet.org
|
Date:
|
Sun, 4 Mar 2001 20:18:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
17544 times
|
| |
|
In lugnet.org.it, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
> [...]
> I'm also starting a little webpage for this list, so that I can update it as
> info comes in:
> http://news.lugnet.com/org/dates
> TIA for any info you can provide!
Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post and
I will update the chart. Thanks!
Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
--Todd
1. 1985 CWC-CW LEGO Railroad - later grew into GMLTC
2. 1994-11-27 De Bouwsteen (Netherlands)
3. 1997-07-24 rtlToronto (Canada)
4. (?) 1997-10? PNLTC: _P_acific _N_orthwest _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
(U.S.A.)
5. 1998-09-10 BayLUG: _Bay_ Area _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
6. 1998-11-14 NGLTC: _N_orth _G_eorgia _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.)
1. 1999-01-28 GMLTC: _G_reater _M_idwest _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.) -
formerly CWC-CW LEGO Railroad
7. (?) 1999-07-16 NOVALTC: _No_rthern _V_irgini_a_ _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub -
now WAMALUG (U.S.A.)
8. 1999-08-10 NELUG: _N_ew _E_ngland _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
9. (?) 1999-02-28 VicLUG: _Vic_toria _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
10. (?) 1999-09-03 GMLUG: _G_reater _M_idwest _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
(U.S.A.)
11. (?) 1999-09-04 TexLUG: _Tex_as _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
12. (?) 1999-09-30 WAFOL: _W_asatch _A_rea _F_ans _o_f _L_EGO (U.S.A.)
13. (?) 1999-10-06 GFLTC: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
(U.S.A.)
14. (?) 1999-10-31 LEGO-MUG: _LEGO_ _M_INDSTORMS _U_sers _G_roup (Japan)
7. (?) 1999-11-15 WAMALUG: _Wa_shington (D.C.) _M_etro _A_rea _L_EGO
_U_sers _G_roup - formerly NOVALTC (U.S.A.)
15. (?) 1999-11-16 ITLUG: _It_alian _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Italy)
16. (?) 1999-11-24 DixieLUG: _Dixie_ _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
17. (?) 1999-11-28 UKLUG: _U_nited _K_ingdom _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.K.)
18. (?) 1999-12-02 LegOz (Australia)
19. 1999-12-09 FGLTC: _F_irst _G_erman _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Germany)
20. (?) 2000-01-12 CMLUG: _C_entral _M_idwest _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
(U.S.A.)
21. (?) 2000-01-15 NCLUG: _N_orth _C_arolina _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
(U.S.A.)
22. (?) 2000-02-06 Studs (Australia)
23. (?) 2000-02-18 LUGOLA: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup _o_f _L_os _A_ngeles
(U.S.A.)
24. (?) 2000-02-22 VLC: _V_ancouver _L_EGO _C_lub (Canada)
25. 2000-03-12 BayLTC: _Bay_ Area _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.)
26. 2000-03-17 NALUG: _N_orthern _A_lberta _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
27. (?) 2000-04-30 EJLTC: _E_ast _J_apan _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Japan)
28. (?) 2000-05-28 SeaLUG: _Se_attle _A_rea _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
29. (?) 2000-07-07 GardenSLUG: _Garden_ _S_tate _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
(U.S.A.)
30. 2000-07-21 WAMALTC: _Wa_shington (D.C.) _M_etro _A_rea _L_EGO _T_rain
_C_lub (U.S.A.)
31. (?) 2000-09-04 GBLTC: _G_reater _B_rianza _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Italy)
32. 2000-10-21 MichLUG: _Mich_igan _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
33. 2000-11-13 MonLUG: _Mon_treal _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
34. 2000-12-12 SMART: _S_eattle _M_indstorms _a_nd _R_obotic _T_echies
(U.S.A.)
35. 2000-01-14 RichLUG: _Rich_mond _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
36. (?) 2000-02-07 LUGCO: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup of _C_entral _O_klahoma
(U.S.A.)
37. (?) 2000-03-02 GFLUG: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
(U.S.A.)
[end]
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post • and
> I will update the chart. Thanks!
>
> Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
>
> 15. (?) 1999-11-16 ITLUG: _It_alian _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Italy)
Hi Todd,
the thread where we voted our current name started on 1999-11-16 and ended
1999-11-17.
I think that 1999-11-16 is OK.
Ciao
Mario
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Todd Lehman (<3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com>) wrote
at 20:18:59
> 17. (?) 1999-11-28 UKLUG: _U_nited _K_ingdom _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.K.)
At this point, I'm inclined to say that there is no such thing as UKLUG,
beyond the web site put together by Simon Denscombe.
There is no evidence of any organisation, no officials, no constitution,
no T-shirts, no nothing.
I had hoped to get some sort of discussion going at yesterday's
gathering, but there were too many other distractions :-)
If anybody else thinks that we really should get something tangible off
the ground, please make yourselves known by responding to this post.
On the other hand, if you think that the way things are at the moment,
with a loose affiliation based around lugnet.loc.uk, is all we need,
please stand up and say that as well.
I'm definitely of the opinion that we need an events manager, though
;-)
--
Tony Priestman
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post and
> I will update the chart. Thanks!
>
> Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
>
> --Todd
>
> 18. (?) 1999-12-02 LegOz (Australia)
>
> 22. (?) 2000-02-06 Studs (Australia)
Should we confirm these dates, note that Studs is STUDS, and ask for BUGS to
be added (as of 2000-11-26 cf http://news.lugnet.com/org/au/?n=1196)?
--Dave
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.au, Dave Low writes:
> In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> > Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> > definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post and
> > I will update the chart. Thanks!
> >
> > Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
> >
> > --Todd
> >
> > 18. (?) 1999-12-02 LegOz (Australia)
> >
> > 22. (?) 2000-02-06 Studs (Australia)
>
> Should we confirm these dates, note that Studs is STUDS, and ask for BUGS to
> be added (as of 2000-11-26 cf http://news.lugnet.com/org/au/?n=1196)?
I thought it was 'Studs' or 'studs', since it is not an acronym.
What about the MUGS and HUGS ?
pete.w (usually not this pedantic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
I thought you were SLUGS, and the fests were StudFests.
And I don't know if there's any "official" inception date for MUG, but I
guess we could say 2001-01-26 as when we voted in our spokesman? MUGs wanna
comment?
ROSCO
Peter White <aztekium@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:G9p74r.6qp@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.org.au, Dave Low writes:
> > In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> > > Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> > > definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post • and
> > > I will update the chart. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
> > >
> > > --Todd
> > >
> > > 18. (?) 1999-12-02 LegOz (Australia)
> > >
> > > 22. (?) 2000-02-06 Studs (Australia)
> >
> > Should we confirm these dates, note that Studs is STUDS, and ask for BUGS • to
> > be added (as of 2000-11-26 cf http://news.lugnet.com/org/au/?n=1196)?
>
> I thought it was 'Studs' or 'studs', since it is not an acronym.
> What about the MUGS and HUGS ?
>
> pete.w (usually not this pedantic)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.au, Ross Crawford writes:
> I thought you were SLUGS, and the fests were StudFests.
>
> And I don't know if there's any "official" inception date for MUG, but I
> guess we could say 2001-01-26 as when we voted in our spokesman? MUGs wanna
> comment?
I'm definitely a SLUG, the others may be studs as well.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.au, Peter White writes:
> > I thought you were SLUGS, and the fests were StudFests.
> >
> >
> I'm definitely a SLUG, the others may be studs as well.
In my little mind I'm a member of STUDS (capitalised, isn't an acronym, just
funny in a non-PC non-genderspecific in-joke kind of way) which is the Sydney
regional Lego Users Group (SLUG/SydLUG). Our bi-monthly gatherings are variously
STUDSfests (because they're our fests and we're members of STUDS) or Studfests
(because the bricks we play with have studs on them) -- I prefer STUDSfests.
SLUGS is a vaguely derogatory/self-deprecating term (depending on who says it)
that refers to the members of STUDS.
--Dave
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
> SLUGS is a vaguely derogatory/self-deprecating term (depending on who says • it)
> that refers to the members of STUDS.
Yes, a SLUGfest sounds like either:
1. a night at a French restaurant eating snails
2. an event of the World Wrestling Federation
It's up to you Sydneysiders, but does the self-image of being an eater of
molluscs or having the same IQ as a mollusc seem that appealing?
Be a man, not a mollusc, I say!
Kerry
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org.au, Ross Crawford writes:
> I thought you were SLUGS, and the fests were StudFests.
>
> And I don't know if there's any "official" inception date for MUG, but I
> guess we could say 2001-01-26 as when we voted in our spokesman? MUGs wanna
> comment?
I think the first real meeting was mid 1999, Ben would know for sure, so I
would say that is the date.
Did we have the inaugural MLTC (VLTC) meeting yesterday?
Martin (S)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Martin Scragg <martin.scragg@s1.com.au> wrote in message
news:G9pLEr.DAC@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.org.au, Ross Crawford writes:
> > I thought you were SLUGS, and the fests were StudFests.
> >
> > And I don't know if there's any "official" inception date for MUG, but I
> > guess we could say 2001-01-26 as when we voted in our spokesman? MUGs • wanna
> > comment?
>
> I think the first real meeting was mid 1999, Ben would know for sure, so I
> would say that is the date.
Probably. I just wasn't sure when MUG was first uttered in this context...
> Did we have the inaugural MLTC (VLTC) meeting yesterday?
Reckon so. And I just uploaded the track design to brickshelf, complete with
dead-end and suicide-loop! I'll do a write-up soon. (Got those pics Sue
Ann?)
Regards,
ROSCO
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
MichLTC or MLTC any way is fine but it was created on January 12th 2001
In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.org.it, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
> > [...]
> > I'm also starting a little webpage for this list, so that I can update it as
> > info comes in:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/org/dates
> > TIA for any info you can provide!
>
> Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post and
> I will update the chart. Thanks!
>
> Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
>
> --Todd
>
>
> 1. 1985 CWC-CW LEGO Railroad - later grew into GMLTC
>
> 2. 1994-11-27 De Bouwsteen (Netherlands)
>
> 3. 1997-07-24 rtlToronto (Canada)
>
> 4. (?) 1997-10? PNLTC: _P_acific _N_orthwest _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 5. 1998-09-10 BayLUG: _Bay_ Area _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 6. 1998-11-14 NGLTC: _N_orth _G_eorgia _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.)
>
> 1. 1999-01-28 GMLTC: _G_reater _M_idwest _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.) -
> formerly CWC-CW LEGO Railroad
>
> 7. (?) 1999-07-16 NOVALTC: _No_rthern _V_irgini_a_ _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub -
> now WAMALUG (U.S.A.)
>
> 8. 1999-08-10 NELUG: _N_ew _E_ngland _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 9. (?) 1999-02-28 VicLUG: _Vic_toria _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
>
> 10. (?) 1999-09-03 GMLUG: _G_reater _M_idwest _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 11. (?) 1999-09-04 TexLUG: _Tex_as _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 12. (?) 1999-09-30 WAFOL: _W_asatch _A_rea _F_ans _o_f _L_EGO (U.S.A.)
>
> 13. (?) 1999-10-06 GFLTC: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 14. (?) 1999-10-31 LEGO-MUG: _LEGO_ _M_INDSTORMS _U_sers _G_roup (Japan)
>
> 7. (?) 1999-11-15 WAMALUG: _Wa_shington (D.C.) _M_etro _A_rea _L_EGO
> _U_sers _G_roup - formerly NOVALTC (U.S.A.)
>
> 15. (?) 1999-11-16 ITLUG: _It_alian _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Italy)
>
> 16. (?) 1999-11-24 DixieLUG: _Dixie_ _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 17. (?) 1999-11-28 UKLUG: _U_nited _K_ingdom _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.K.)
>
> 18. (?) 1999-12-02 LegOz (Australia)
>
> 19. 1999-12-09 FGLTC: _F_irst _G_erman _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Germany)
>
> 20. (?) 2000-01-12 CMLUG: _C_entral _M_idwest _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 21. (?) 2000-01-15 NCLUG: _N_orth _C_arolina _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 22. (?) 2000-02-06 Studs (Australia)
>
> 23. (?) 2000-02-18 LUGOLA: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup _o_f _L_os _A_ngeles
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 24. (?) 2000-02-22 VLC: _V_ancouver _L_EGO _C_lub (Canada)
>
> 25. 2000-03-12 BayLTC: _Bay_ Area _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (U.S.A.)
>
> 26. 2000-03-17 NALUG: _N_orthern _A_lberta _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
>
> 27. (?) 2000-04-30 EJLTC: _E_ast _J_apan _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Japan)
>
> 28. (?) 2000-05-28 SeaLUG: _Se_attle _A_rea _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 29. (?) 2000-07-07 GardenSLUG: _Garden_ _S_tate _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 30. 2000-07-21 WAMALTC: _Wa_shington (D.C.) _M_etro _A_rea _L_EGO _T_rain
> _C_lub (U.S.A.)
>
> 31. (?) 2000-09-04 GBLTC: _G_reater _B_rianza _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub (Italy)
>
> 32. 2000-10-21 MichLUG: _Mich_igan _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 33. 2000-11-13 MonLUG: _Mon_treal _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (Canada)
>
> 34. 2000-12-12 SMART: _S_eattle _M_indstorms _a_nd _R_obotic _T_echies
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 35. 2000-01-14 RichLUG: _Rich_mond _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 36. (?) 2000-02-07 LUGCO: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup of _C_entral _O_klahoma
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 37. (?) 2000-03-02 GFLUG: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
>
> [end]
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.org.it, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
> > [...]
> > I'm also starting a little webpage for this list, so that I can update it as
> > info comes in:
> > http://news.lugnet.com/org/dates
> > TIA for any info you can provide!
>
> Here is an updated list. I am still missing a fair amount of info...any
> definitive info is appreciated! Please post as a follow-up to this post and
> I will update the chart. Thanks!
>
> Looks like we're almost to 40 now... :)
>
> --Todd
> ...SNIP...
> 13. (?) 1999-10-06 GFLTC: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
The GFLTC was formed at the H&R Train Show (Sat, Oct 2, 1999) where I met
Dennis and Nick. We talk for an hour and decided to start the club.
> ...SNIP...
>
> 37. (?) 2000-03-02 GFLUG: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
The GFLUG started at a GFLTC meeting on June 21, 2000. This is where KK Quah
and I decided to start the LUG.
Good Luck...
Robin W
GFLTC/GFLUG
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, "Robin Werner" <robstormer@cs.com> writes:
> > > I'm also starting a little webpage for this list, so that I can update it as
> > > info comes in:
> > > http://news.lugnet.com/org/dates
> > > TIA for any info you can provide!
> > [...]
> The GFLTC was formed at the H&R Train Show (Sat, Oct 2, 1999) where I met
> Dennis and Nick. We talk for an hour and decided to start the club.
> [...]
> The GFLUG started at a GFLTC meeting on June 21, 2000. This is where KK Quah
> and I decided to start the LUG.
OK, got it -- both dates. Page updated. Thanks!
--Todd
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
in article 3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com, Todd Lehman wrote:
> In lugnet.org.it, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
> 28. (?) 2000-05-28 SeaLUG: _Se_attle _A_rea _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
SEALUG held our first meeting on September 2, 2000, IIRC.
Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm not remembering correctly.
What's the 5-28 date from?
~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
--
Mark's Lego(R) Creations
http://www.nwlink.com/~sandlin/lego
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, Mark Sandlin writes:
> in article 3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com, Todd Lehman wrote:
>
> > In lugnet.org.it, Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> writes:
>
> > 28. (?) 2000-05-28 SeaLUG: _Se_attle _A_rea _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> SEALUG held our first meeting on September 2, 2000, IIRC.
>
> Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm not remembering correctly.
>
> What's the 5-28 date from?
>
> ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
I think it was a little before that - The first post to the Lugnet Sealug
group was on Aug 24, 2000. I would have thought that we met before we got
our official Lugnet group. Maybe in July?
-mark (2)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, Mark Rideout writes:
> In lugnet.org, Mark Sandlin writes:
> > in article 3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com, Todd Lehman wrote:
> >
> > SEALUG held our first meeting on September 2, 2000, IIRC.
> >
> > Anyone feel free to correct me if I'm not remembering correctly.
> > ~Grand Admiral Muffin Head
>
> I think it was a little before that - The first post to the Lugnet Sealug
> group was on Aug 24, 2000. I would have thought that we met before we got
> our official Lugnet group. Maybe in July?
>
> -mark (2)
Just following up to add the Sealug group back to this chain.
-mark(2)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com...
[snip]
> 35. 2000-01-14 RichLUG: _Rich_mond _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
>
> 36. (?) 2000-02-07 LUGCO: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup of _C_entral _O_klahoma
> (U.S.A.)
>
> 37. (?) 2000-03-02 GFLUG: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> (U.S.A.)
Todd:
For these last three, the year should be 2001, not 2000. Just a minor
correction. :-) Thanks.
Tim
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, "Timothy D. Freshly" <timfreshly@shaheenlaw.com> writes:
> > 35. 2000-01-14 RichLUG: _Rich_mond _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup (U.S.A.)
> >
> > 36. (?) 2000-02-07 LUGCO: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup of _C_entral _O_klahoma
> > (U.S.A.)
> >
> > 37. (?) 2000-03-02 GFLUG: _G_reater _F_lorida _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup
> > (U.S.A.)
>
> Todd:
>
> For these last three, the year should be 2001, not 2000. Just a minor
> correction. :-)
d'Oh! Time warp!
> Thanks.
No, thank you!
--Todd
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
"Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message
news:3aa29f04.91709731@lugnet.com...
> 31. (?) 2000-09-04 GBLTC: _G_reater _B_rianza _L_EGO _T_rain _C_lub
(Italy)
Todd,
GBLTC was mainly a joke. (It really never existed....)
The real name is: ITLTC: _IT_alian _L_ego _T_rain _C_lub.
http://www.itltc.org/
As you can see in: http://www.geocities.com/mario.ferrari/itlug_news_e.html
it was born October 13th 2000.
Thanks!
Carlo
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Todd,
Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
Thanks,
Franklin
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In lugnet.org, "Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> writes:
> Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
> 1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
> 2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
> 3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
> 4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
OK, so is 22 Jan 2000 the "official" date that your organization was formed?
Or was that just its first official meeting?
If I'm reading this post correctly...
http://news.lugnet.com/loc/us/ga/?n=54
...DixieLUG came into being on 19 Dec 1999?
--Todd
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
|
In lugnet.org, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> In lugnet.org, "Franklin W. Cain" <fwcain@yahoo.com> writes:
> >
> > Here are the dates for Dixie LUG:
> > 1st meeting of DixieLUG - 22 January 2000
> > 2nd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 April 2000
> > 3rd meeting of DixieLUG - 8 July 2000
> > 4th meeting of DixieLUG - 26 August 2000
>
> OK, so is 22 Jan 2000 the "official" date that your organization
> was formed? Or was that just its first official meeting?
First ever face-to-face meeting. (...I'm hesitant to use the word
"official", though, in response to some spirited discussion quite
a while ago regarding which term to use: "members" vs. "attendees".
One of the more vigorously defended opinions -- by whom,
I no longer recall -- was that the term "members" would be too
formal and officious, so we agreed to stay informal and relaxed.
Just simple, laid-back Southern behavior. ;-)
> If I'm reading this post correctly...
> http://news.lugnet.com/loc/us/ga/?n=54
> ...DixieLUG came into being on 19 Dec 1999?
OK. That works for me.
I hope that recollections have been of assistance. ;-)
Thanks,
Franklin
PS,
In case I've not yet said so, CONGRATULATIONS on y'all's upcoming marriage.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Hello Todd,
LUGCO was formed 2001-01-22
Thanks,
Todd Trotter
> 36. (?) 2000-02-07 LUGCO: _L_EGO _U_sers _G_roup of _C_entral _O_klahoma
> (U.S.A.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Todd,
LCLTC Low Country LTC is in Charleston, SC
First meeting was 10-23-01.
We have a 4 members.
Thanx,
Mark
#525
| | | | | | |
