 | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Thomas Main
|
| | | (...) I wouldn't call the comment stupid. I think it comes from a fan who feels let down and now questions his support of the company that made the decision that led to his disappontment. I feel let down too. I don't want to buy the Lego "brand" by (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) The difference, of course, is that the facade of brand-purism would be torn down, and fans would finally have to determine whether they're purists because it's LEGO or because it's made in Enfield. There may be a legitimate issue of quality (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | (...) I'm sick to death of this equation of manufacturing in poor countries being eqivalent to slavery/evil/whatever. It is quite possible for a company to employ people at a good local income in a country where the cost of living is lower and still (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Erik Olson
|
| | | | | | | This recent article on Sweden seemed relevant, though Denmark is compared somewhat favorably, I still wonder about the jobs numbers. (URL) retained the world's highest taxes, generous social security systems and a heavily regulated labor market, (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Thomas Main
|
| | | | | | (...) Fair enough - cost savings can be achieved. If all this new work resulted in standards of living increasing in the countries the jobs were farmed out to - wouldn't the wages then have to rise to compensate? Then what would be the long-term (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes the wages and costs would rise with time. The extra money generated in the meanwhile can be used for internal job creation and raising of standards. If the business costs become too high then the business can move to a new lower cost (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Larry Marak
|
| | | | | | (...) Definitely China has a massive and booming middle class. the current generation of children are called the spoiled ones, because parents in the big cities (by law) are having only one child and giving them everything they didn't have while (...) (18 years ago, 28-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) The bottom line is that TLG is a business, and they are doing whatever they feel necessary to remain in business. Some bad business decisions? Perhaps, but to blame TLG for not having perfect market vision is a little harsh. TLG is an old (...) (18 years ago, 23-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Thomas Main
|
| | | | | | (...) Actually, I am glad that they have work, but I would prefer it not processing raw materials for a foreign company so that people can have toys. There are other ways they could be productive -- farming, for instance. Or producing goods that (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Douglas Brod
|
| | | | | | (...) There's a difference: no one is forcing workers in China to go work for these factories. In fact, the hierarchy in China as far as desirable places to work: American company European company Japan/Korean company (a perceived step down to this (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Massive Layoffs At Lego (in Enfield, CT) —Sean Kenney
|
| | | | Re: LEGO migrating production to Singapore (...) Thomas Main wrote: (...) I'd just like to toss in that Singapore is a first world country, not a third world country. It's more urbanized than Tokyo, a heck of a lot cleaner than New York (where I (...) (18 years ago, 24-Jun-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
