Debate : 27664


Off-Topic / Debate / 27664	27663 \| 27665

Subject:	Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty
Newsgroups:	lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date:	Tue, 7 Mar 2006 02:55:55 GMT
Viewed:	1746 times

Hi, Bruce.

Thanks for the comments on this matter, too. I will probably redo the Acts story as part of my revamp of the New Testament part of the site, and will add the missing panels there as well.

I think it’s not just that it would be misrepresenting these stories, but also that I wouldn’t want people to dismiss The Brick Testament as a whole just because these two questionable instances of editing down the stories.

-Brendan

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty
Just wanted to chime in again and say I appreciate your thoughtful response to my concerns. I also wanted to say I really enjoy your work, even when I don't agree with the commentary and editing decisions. And I look forward to more entries. Thanks, (...) (18 years ago, 13-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: The Brick Testament's entirely unnacceptable intellectual dishonesty
Hey Brendan, I appreciate the fact that you added the final two illustrations to the Canaanite woman story. I think that it was right to do so, as to leave those out seriously misrepresented the story. While your commentary on how everyone selects (...) (18 years ago, 6-Mar-06, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

13 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search