To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.lego.directOpen lugnet.lego.direct in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 LEGO Company / LEGO Direct / 4860
4859  |  4861
Subject: 
Re: Legends Vote winner - Announcement tomorrow!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.lego.direct
Date: 
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 20:33:22 GMT
Viewed: 
786 times
  
David Eaton wrote:

In lugnet.lego.direct, Benjamin Medinets writes:
In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes:
One minor correction: the runners up are listed in no particular order.

My Bad...I thought they were.  Sorry.  Perhaps a numbered vote count would
give the Fans a better perspective on how each model faired in the voting.

Agree-- and in the event that TLC doesn't want to release the raw
numbers(1), perhaps we could see at least the order they came in?

DaveE

(1) This kinda sounds like info that TLC might not want to release, as there
may have been other factors involved in the decision on TLC's part that
they'd rather not expose. So, say, if BSB got fewer raw votes than Main
Street, but had much better numbers on *other* preference questions (recall
that for voting there were several questions), they won't have to take flak
on which was the best decision given the numbers they had.

Note that if the winner was chosen by balancing the various questions
that they might not know the complete order since they may have only
used the other factors for the two top contenders or something).

It may be best though not to release the order at all. It will just give
something for people to whine about. I could make some guesses as to how
and why the voting fell:

- With two castle sets, the castle vote was certainly diluted (though
"other factors" could have led them to chose one of the castle sets if
there was a clear preference for a castle set). My guess is that had
6074 been the only castle choice it would have won (though my first
choice was 6075).

- The Battrax probably doesn't have as wide an appeal as another Space
set has. In my opinion, this offering hurt the chance to see a Space
set.

- While we have seen a re-release of a Pirate Ship, of all the
offerings, a Pirate Ship is the only thing which can't easily be made
from parts of many other sets (in that it depends on the cloth sails for
sure, and the hull pieces don't hurt either).

- Two town sets were released earlier this year.

I hope that we will actually see all of these sets (or at least all that
received a good showing, I wouldn't cry if the Battrax never made it,
there are other Space sets I'd much rather see).

Frank



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Legends Vote winner - Announcement tomorrow!
 
(...) Well, they could still figure out who #2,#3,etc would be, just by using whatever logic they used for the actual winner, and applying it to the remaining 4... (...) Agree-- It's one of those things where I'd be curious to know, but in the long (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Legends Vote winner - Announcement tomorrow!
 
(...) Agree-- and in the event that TLC doesn't want to release the raw numbers(1), perhaps we could see at least the order they came in? DaveE (1) This kinda sounds like info that TLC might not want to release, as there may have been other factors (...) (22 years ago, 9-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)

10 Messages in This Thread:



Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR