Subject:
|
Re: First Ever Juniorized Lego Part?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:00:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1002 times
|
| |
|
|
"D. Shifflett" <shifflett@redshift.com> wrote in message
news:IJI1ux.63s@lugnet.com...
> Oh yes you do need the larger bricks and plates.
> You could never get good structural integrity out of only small
> plates or bricks.
Some of the "juniorized" parts are also done for various structural reasons.
I'd also point out that the BURP can not be made of other parts. There are
LEGO sets that utilize the hollow nature of the BURP. These sets could not
be built the same way with bricks.
I'm not really convinced juniorization is a useful term. It's all too often
just used as a derogatory term for a part the speaker feels is useless,
ignoring that there might be valid design reasons for that part (which may
include creating sets for younger kids).
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: First Ever Juniorized Lego Part?
|
| (...) I agree with Anders, what parts were you thinking about that were 'juniorized' to make this part. (...) Slight problem here Anders, the 4x4 with rounded corner didn't exist until 40 years after the Wing 4x8 Wow 40 years, that's a really long (...) (19 years ago, 12-Jul-05, to lugnet.general)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
