| |
In lugnet.castle, Dylan Bradley writes:
>
> First of all, have you seen Robin Hood Prince of Theves (1)? Well if you
> have, mentally jump to the scene where The "Forest People" (Robin Hood,
> etc.) are being attacked by the Sherif of Nottingham and the wierd,
> animalistic-like people he hired to help (forget their names).
>
> It's those very same animalistic-like peoples I've recapitulated to
> characterize my boyz (wolfpack... <g>)... As for FM and DF, I'd say they're
> the equivalent of Robin Hood & Co. in that same movie...
If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
happy with their portrayal.
Tony
|
|
| |
> If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> happy with their portrayal.
>
> Tony
Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
-Chris
|
|
| |
Tony Rowe wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.castle, Dylan Bradley writes:
> >
> > First of all, have you seen Robin Hood Prince of Theves (1)? Well if you
> > have, mentally jump to the scene where The "Forest People" (Robin Hood,
> > etc.) are being attacked by the Sherif of Nottingham and the wierd,
> > animalistic-like people he hired to help (forget their names).
> >
> > It's those very same animalistic-like peoples I've recapitulated to
> > characterize my boyz (wolfpack... <g>)... As for FM and DF, I'd say • they're
> > the equivalent of Robin Hood & Co. in that same movie...
>
> If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> happy with their portrayal.
They were supposed to be Celts? Wow... I stand corrected.
Hmm...
Never the less, they are the closest thing to how I see Wolfpack I can think
of... Except the name, of course.
Apologetically,
DBR
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> > happy with their portrayal.
> >
> > Tony
>
> Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
> portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> -Chris
Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
~Nathan
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> > > happy with their portrayal.
> > >
> > > Tony
> >
> > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
> > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > -Chris
>
> Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
Only vaguely. Scots are much more Pictish, really. No self-respecting Celt
is going to strip down and cover himself in blue paint before battle. ;)
If you're looking for Celts(1), you should be looking in Ireland and Wales.
That being said, there's been so much intermingling in that region that
everyone is a bit of everything.
James (the slowly recovering from very busy weeks)
1:Of the non-Bostonian variety - so pronounce it with a hard "c" folks.
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > >
> > > > Tony
> > >
> > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > -Chris
> >
> > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
>
> Only vaguely. Scots are much more Pictish, really. No self-respecting Celt
> is going to strip down and cover himself in blue paint before battle. ;)
The celts were stripping down to their bare shield back when they were
terrorizing early Rome. I forget whether they were into woad at that time, but
I'll check my books when I get home. I think they were, but celts wander in
and out of so many places - Galatia, Greece, Italy, Briton, etc. - I tend to
confuse one era with another sometimes.
Bruce
Bruce
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not • very
> > > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > > -Chris
> > >
> > > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> >
> > Only vaguely. Scots are much more Pictish, really. No self-respecting Celt
> > is going to strip down and cover himself in blue paint before battle. ;)
>
> The celts were stripping down to their bare shield back when they were
> terrorizing early Rome. I forget whether they were into woad at that time, • but
> I'll check my books when I get home. I think they were, but celts wander in
> and out of so many places - Galatia, Greece, Italy, Briton, etc. - I tend to
> confuse one era with another sometimes.
>
> Bruce
Heck, they even took over the city of Rome! However, that only lasted one day.
Wait a minute... maybe that was the Visigoths.
Err... any history majors with a better memory than mine?
Tony
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Tony A. Rowe writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, James Brown writes:
> > > No self-respecting Celt
> > > is going to strip down and cover himself in blue paint before battle. ;)
> >
> > The celts were stripping down to their bare shield back when they were
> > terrorizing early Rome. I forget whether they were into woad at that time, • but
> > I'll check my books when I get home. I think they were, but celts wander in
> > and out of so many places - Galatia, Greece, Italy, Briton, etc. - I tend to
> > confuse one era with another sometimes.
> >
> > Bruce
>
> Heck, they even took over the city of Rome! However, that only lasted one • day.
>
> Wait a minute... maybe that was the Visigoths.
>
> Err... any history majors with a better memory than mine?
>
> Tony
The Visigoths did a leisurely pillage of Rome over two weeks.
Bruce
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> > > happy with their portrayal.
> > >
> > > Tony
> >
> > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a bad
> > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > -Chris
>
> Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
>
> ~Nathan
No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts
are niether Scottish or Pictish.
-Chris
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not very
> > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > >
> > > > Tony
> > >
> > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > -Chris
> >
> > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> >
> > ~Nathan
>
> No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts
> are niether Scottish or Pictish.
> -Chris
If you are interested in the history of these peoples go to <A
HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DavidDale1/Hisco.htm">The
History of the Scots, Picts, and Britons by David F. Dale</A>
~Nathan
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not • very
> > > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tony
> > > >
> > > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > > -Chris
> > >
> > > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> > >
> > > ~Nathan
Yep, you're right. I stand corrected.
-Chris
> >
> > No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts
> > are niether Scottish or Pictish.
>
> > -Chris
>
> If you are interested in the history of these peoples go to <A
> HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DavidDale1/Hisco.htm">The
> History of the Scots, Picts, and Britons by David F. Dale</A>
>
> ~Nathan
|
|
| |
In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > In lugnet.castle, Nathan McDowell writes:
> > > > In lugnet.castle, Chris Maddison writes:
> > > > > > If memory serves me right, those were supposed to be Celts. I was not • very
> > > > > > happy with their portrayal.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Tony
> > > > >
> > > > > Ahh, Celts! Now it makes sense (light bulb above head) All these years I
> > > > > thought they were making fun of Scots, but instead they were just doing a • bad
> > > > > portrayal of Celts. Thanks for the clarification.
> > > > > -Chris
> > > >
> > > > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> > > >
> > > > ~Nathan
>
>
> Yep, you're right. I stand corrected.
> -Chris
Sorry, I didn't mean to sound so harsh. I didn't mean it harsh, but I just
read it again and it does kinda sound that way, sorry. =)
~Nathan
> > >
> > > No, no. The Scottish are of Pictish decent, as well as Germanic. The Celts
> > > are niether Scottish or Pictish.
> >
> > > -Chris
> >
> > If you are interested in the history of these peoples go to <A
> > HREF="http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/DavidDale1/Hisco.htm">The
> > History of the Scots, Picts, and Britons by David F. Dale</A>
> >
> > ~Nathan
|
|
| |
> > > > > Excuse me? You must be joking... Scots *are* Celtic..
> > > > >
> > > > > ~Nathan
> >
> >
> > Yep, you're right. I stand corrected.
> > -Chris
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean to sound so harsh. I didn't mean it harsh, but I just
> read it again and it does kinda sound that way, sorry. =)
>
> ~Nathan
No problem, man. Don't beat yourself up over it. I just had some bad info,
and you righted it. Nothing wrong with that. The sad thing is, my great
grandfather is Scottish...sorry Grandpa <looks at sky and cowers>
-Chris
|
|
|
