Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:06:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
820 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Orion Pobursky writes:
> I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out
> those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have
> proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what
> qualification someone must have in order to be declared competent but I
> think the reqs as they stand are good enough, with or without my suggestion.
That was the intent of the minimum requirements. I'd like this to be as open
as possible too, without risking the integrity and competency of the
decision making body by allowing someone to walk in off the street and get in.
> I'm am not and will never be "polically correct". I say keep the list open.
> If someone has a personal beef with anyone in the LSC then they can take the
> courteous path of private Email discussion not via the public forum. The
> public boards are no place for attacks on a persons character or ability.
Yep. I'm leaning towards a publicly viewable LSC mailing list myself. They
publish congressional records - and what we're doing is infinitely trivial
to the decisions they make.
-Tim
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what qualification someone (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
