Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:19:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
714 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dan Boger writes:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 04:00:20PM +0000, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> > -Served as a reviwer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official parts
> > updates and have posted least 5 reviews per update
> >
> > This ensures that the candidate has activly served as a reviewer and is not
> > just somebody who happens to have reviewer access
>
> I agree, 100%. I think we should have more representation from the
> programming side of the community.
Right. The proposal is set up in such a way to encourage everyone -
programmer or not - to discuss the issues publicly. When it comes to making
decisions, a limited group of qualified people (in this case, programmers,
parts authors, or reviewers) to actually cast the vote to create an
LDraw.org standard. Naturally, the LSC members would be expected and
encouraged to participate in the public discussion, but they're the ones who
make the decision.
I suppose whether the LSC private list is publicly viewable or not is
something else up for debate - on one hand, transparency is a good thing, on
the other, it would be nice for them to have a forum where they don't have
to be politically correct.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I agree that the slots should be open to everyone but I'd like to weed out those who are the "rainy day" LDrawers. In other words, you need to have proven your competency and commitment. We could go on and on about what qualification someone (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) right. I was saying that the LSC needs to be qualified (as Orion pointed out), AND that the LSC needs more representation from the programmers. Currently, as far as I can tell, it has (from the stats I could gather): Jacob: parts author, (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
