To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.dat.partsOpen lugnet.cad.dat.parts in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / LDraw Files / Parts / 6105
6104  |  6106
Subject: 
Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
Date: 
Tue, 6 Mar 2007 21:37:50 GMT
Viewed: 
5193 times
  
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Timothy Gould wrote:
   there is no such thing as an intractable problem

There is, however, such a thing as an impractical problem ;)

ROSCO



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
 
(...) No there's not. I'm a physicist... not an engineer ;) Tim (17 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Part Authors: opinions sought on T-Junctions
 
(...) Arguably it's probably the algorithms and/or numerical proccessing that are at fault. Certainly when you design scientific code algorithms they should usually be created in such a way that it minimises numerical error. Of course I don't expect (...) (17 years ago, 6-Mar-07, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)

22 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR